Skip to main content
Internet Archive's 25th Anniversary Logo

Full text of "Surface photometry of nearby field galaxies: the data"

See other formats


The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 127:000-000, 2000 March (MS-40536-ApJS) 

Preprint typeset using lATJ^X style eniulateapj_rj 



SURFACE PHOTOMETRY OF NEARBY FIELD GALAXIES: THE DATA 

Rolf A. Jansen^^^, Marijn Franx^'^, Daniel Fabricant^, & Nelson Caldwell"''^ 

^Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, Postbus 800, NL-9700 AV Groningen, The Netherlands 

^Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden St., Cambridge, MA 02138 

^Leiden Observatory, Postbus 9513, NL-2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands 

■*F.L. Whipple Observatory, Amado, AZ 85645 

jansen@astro.rug.nl, franx@strw.leidenuniv.nl, dfabricant or ncaldwell@cfa.harvard.edu 

Received 1999 May 5; accepted 1999 August 19 

■q^- ■ ABSTRACT 

0^ ■ We have obtained integrated spectra and multi-filter photometry for a representative sample 

^ of ~200 nearby galaxies. These galaxies span the entire Hubble sequence in morphological type, 

as well as a wide range of luminosities (M^ = —14 to —22) and colors {B — R = 0.4 to 1.8). 

CJ . Here we describe the sample selection criteria and the U,B,R surface photometry for these 

^^ ' galaxies. The spectrophotometric results will be presented in a companion paper. Our goals for 

the project include measuring the current star formation rates and metallicity of these galaxies, 

and elucidating their star formation histories, as a function of luminosity and morphology. We 

thereby extend the work of Kennicutt (1992) to lower luminosity systems. We anticipate that 

^ I our study will be useful as a benchmark for studies of galaxies at high redshift. 

We discuss the observing, data reduction and calibration techniques, and show that our 
f~^ , photometry agrees well with previous work in those cases where earlier data are available. We 

^^ ' present an atlas of images, radial surface brightness profiles and color profiles, as well as tables of 

derived parameters. The atlas and tables of measurements will be made available electronically. 
We study the correlations of galaxy properties determined from the galaxy images. Our 
findings include: (1) colors determined within the effective radius correlate better with mor- 
phological type than with M^ and (2) 50% of the low luminosity galaxies are bluest in their 
centers. 

Subject headings: cosmology: galaxy population — galaxies: surface photometry — galaxies: 
^ ' fundamental parameters — galaxies: nearby — galaxies: surveys, atlases 

c^ ■ 

1. INTRODUCTION ter, surface photometry is available for these galaxies. 

'O ; With the advent of the Hubble Space Telescope, ^1^°' ^^^^ ^f ^^ Kennicutt's sample of 90 galaxies 

"S ■ 8-m class ground-based telescopes, and effective new ^^^ observed at 5-7A spectral resolution by trailmg 

d ' ■ 4. 4. -J. ■ -ui J- 4- J 4-v, 1 the image of a galaxy across a long slit. The remam- 

>T ■ instruments, it is now possible to study the colors, i ir , i % , , , 

.1- 1 , PI 1 ri-.j. mg halt was observed at 15-20A resolution through 

morphologies and spectra or large samples of distant, °^ ^„ . , 

faint galaxies. Frequently, our interpretation of such J u t^- u'r^ i c ^m-c^/^cn 

data is hmited by the scarcity of good comparison ^ith our Nearby Field Galaxy Survey NFGS), our 

samples in the local universe. Because distant galax- f ^^ i\*° significantly extend Kennicutt s work. We 

ies subtend angles comparable to spectrograph slit have obtained integrated and nuclear spectroscopy, 

widths, we usually obtain integrated spectra, while ^^^^^ U, B, R surface photometry, for a sample of 196 

the same slits sample only the nuclear regions of ^^^^^^^ ^^ ^^^ ^^^f^^ ^^^t 'T^ 

nearby galaxies. This observational issue complicates ^^^^^^^^ °f f morphological types and spans 8 mag- 

the comparison of distant and nearby galaxy spectra. f^^^^f ^^ luminosity. We include galaxies from a 

In a pioneering effort, Kennicutt (1992ab) obtained ^^^^^ range of local galaxy densities, attemptmg to 

integrated spectrophotometry for 90 galaxies span- ^^o^^ a bias towards a particular environment Our 

ning the entire Hubble sequence. This study has had f « °f ^^f *^™ ^f ^^^ corresponds to that of Koo 

broad apphcation for the study of galaxy spectral ^ ^ron (1992) and Ellis (1997). We use these ob- 

properties at both high and low redshift. Kennicutt's nervations to study the emission and absorption Ime 

study, however, is limited to the brightest galaxies of strengths, metallicities, star formation rates and star 

each morphological type, and no uniform, multiple fil- formation histories, morphologies, structural param- 



in 



in 



0^ 



O 



SURFACE PHOTOMETRY OF NEARBY FIELD GALAXIES 



eters, and colors of the sample galaxies. These data 
can be used as an aid in understanding the spectra 
and imagery of galaxies at larger distances, and in 
measuring the changes in their properties over time. 
In this first paper we describe the sample selection 
and present the surface photometry data. In subse- 
quent papers we will present the spectrophotometric 
data, and present further analysis of the complete 
data set. The structure of this paper is as follows. 
Section |2| discusses the sample selection. In Section Q 
we discuss the observing strategy, data reduction, cal- 
ibration issues and an assessment of the data quality 
and errors. We present the primary data products in 
section ^ We conclude with a short discussion (sec- 
tion ^). Notes on individual objects in the sample 
are collected in appendix ^, and the details of the 
adopted photometric calibration procedure are given 
in appendix |^. 

2. SAMPLE SELECTION 

We selected galaxies from the first CfA redshift cat- 
alog (CfA I), which contains galaxies to a limiting 
blue photographic magnitude of mz = 14.5 (Huchra 
et al. 1983). This catalog has several virtues: (1) it is 
nearly complete within its selection limits, (2) it con- 
tains galaxies with a large range in absolute magni- 
tude (-22 ^ Mz ^ -13 for Ho=100 km s'^ Mpc'^), 
and (3) all galaxies in the catalog have been morpho- 
logically classified. As the CfA I catalog is too large 
(~2400 galaxies) for a full spectroscopic and photo- 
metric survey, we have selected a subsample of ~200 
galaxies as described below. Our goal was to select 
a sample of galaxies which spans the full range of 
galaxy properties in the CfA sample. 

Because the FAST spectrograph (Fabricant 
et al. 1998) used to obtain the galaxy spectra for 
this survey has a maximum slit length of ~3', we 
wished to minimize the number of galaxies larger 
than the slit length. We avoided a strict diameter 
limit that might introduce a bias against low surface 
brightness galaxies. Instead, we selected higher lu- 
minosity galaxies (generally the largest) at greater 
distances by imposing a lower limit on radial veloc- 
ity that increases with luminosity. After applying 
a correction for the motion of the Milky Way with 
respect to the Local Group standard of rest, this 
cutoff is VLG(km s'^) > io-0-i9~0-2Mz. We take for 
the velocity with respect to the Local Group stan- 
dard of rest: Vlg = Vheiio + 300 cos(6)sin(/). This 
approximates the result of Yahil et al. (1977). Here, 
we calculate galaxy distances directly from Vlg-, as- 
suming Ho=100 km s~^ Mpc^^. No correction for 
infall towards the Virgo Cluster was applied at this 
stage. 

In order to avoid a sampling bias favoring a cluster 



population we also excluded galaxies in the direction 
of the Virgo Cluster with Vlg < 2000 km s~^ in the 
RA and DEC ranges given by Binggeli et al. (1985). 
A total of 1006 galaxies are left after our radial ve- 
locity and Virgo Cluster cuts, only a few of which are 
larger than 3'. 

Our goal was to reduce this number to ~200 galax- 
ies with a distribution in M^ that spans the full range 
in galaxy luminosities, and that fairly samples the 
changing mix of morphological types as a function of 
M^. To this end, the sample was sorted into 1 mag- 
nitude wide bins of M^ and within each bin by mor- 
phological type. We then selected every A^th galaxy 
in each bin, where N is the ratio between the total 
and desired number of galaxies in the bin (chosen 
to approximate the local galaxy luminosity function, 
e.g. Marzke et al. 1994). The total number of galax- 
ies entering our statistical sample is 196. The median 
redshift in this sample is 0.01, and the maximum red- 
shift is ~0.07 (Al2195-h7535). 

The morphological types used in the selection were 
taken from Huchra et al. (1983). The types as used 
elsewhere in this paper are mainly from a later release 
of the CfA redshift survey and its extensions (Huchra 
et al. 1997) and from independent reclassifications by 
the authors, S. Kannappan and J. P. Huchra, using 
our CCD imagery. The main difference between the 
original and updated types is that the fraction of un- 
classified spirals and "peculiars" has been reduced, 
and that a few galaxies that were clearly mistyped 
have been reclassified. The reclassifications have not 
biased the sample, as they are redistributed fairly 
evenly over morphological type. 

In table 1 we collect the global parameters of our 
sample as used in the sample selection. Column 

(I) lists the galaxy identifications as used through- 
out this paper, while columns (2) and (3) give the 
common names (NGC, IC, or lAU anonymous nota- 
tion) and UGC catalog number (Nilson 1973), respec- 
tively. Columns (4) through (7) contain the equato- 
rial and Galactic coordinates. The equatorial coordi- 
nates were remeasured from the Digital Sky Survey 
(DSS), reduced to B1950.0, and are accurate to ~1". 
Columns (8) through (10) list the original numeric 
morphological types (Huchra et al. 1983) as used in 
the sample selection, and the numeric types and 
their translation on the Hubble sequence as adopted 
throughout the further analysis of the data. Columns 

(II) and (12) give the systemic velocities, both helio- 
centric and reduced to the Local Group standard of 
rest. Column (13) lists the absolute magnitude calcu- 
lated from the blue photographic magnitude (CGCG, 
Zwicky et al. 1961-8) and the systemic velocity, as- 
suming a simple uniform Hubble flow and Ho=100 
km s~^ Mpc~^. Columns (14) and (15) list the blue 



JANSEN ^TAL. 



Table 1 
Identification and global parameters of the sample galaxies. 



ID 


Name 


UGC 


"1950 


51950 


hi 


bu 


T 


T 


type 


cz 


Vlg 


Mz 


a 


e 


PA 


A, 


data 






# 


from DSS 


n 


n 


sclt 


new 


new 


(km/s) 


(km/s) 


mag 


1 


(1-^) 


O 


mag 




(1) 


(2) 


(3) 


(4) 


(5) 


(6) 


(7) 


(8) 


(9) 


(10) 


(11) 


(12) 


(13) 


(14) 


(15) 


(16) 


(17) 


(18) 



1 


A00113+3037 


130 


00 11 21.0 +30 36 18.3 113.518 


-31.302 


-6 


-6 


cE 


4735 


4858 


-19.28 


0.45 


0.222 


160 


0.19 


inubr 


2 


A00289+0556 


313 


00 28 51.3 +05 55 50.1 113.942 


-56.316 


7 


7 


Sd 


2055 


2093 


-17.42 


1.40 


0.429 


10 


0.17 


inubr 


3 


NGC 193 


408 


00 36 44.1 +03 03 23.7 116.977 


-59.400 


-3 


-3 


80- 


4340 


4317 


-18.95 


1.70 


0.059 


55 


0.07 


inubr 


4 


A00389-0159 


439 


00 38 48.1 -01 59 24.1 117.078 


-64.473 


1 


1 


Sa 


5302 


5243 


-19.27 


1.20 


0.000 


170 


0.07 


inubr 


5 


A00442+3224 


484 


00 44 14.0 +32 24 08.9 121.836 


-30.187 


3 


3 


Sb 


4859 


4971 


-19.43 


2.80 


0.714 


25 


0.20 


inubr 


6 


A00510+1225 


545 


00 50 57.8 +12 25 20.4 123.749 


-50.175 


-6 


5 


Sc 


18116 


18276 


-22.31 


0.60 


0.167 


— 


0.20 


inubr 


7 


NGC 315 


597 


00 55 05.7 +30 04 57.7 124.563 


-32.499 





-5 


E 


4956 


5050 


-21.06 


3.00 


0.167 


40 


0.28 


inubr 


8 


A00570+1504 


615 


00 57 01.8 +15 03 42.0 125.870 


-47.494 


2 


2 


Sab 


5517 


5528 


-19.57 


1.00 


0.500 


23 


0.16 


inubr 


9 


(A01047+1625) 


685 


01 04 43.0 +16 25 02.7 128.431 


-46.017 


10 


10 


Im 


158 


305 


-13.03 


1.90 


0.316 


120 


0.11 


inubr 


10 


NGC 382 


688 


01 04 38.2 +32 08 13.7 126.836 


-30.347 


— 7 


-5 


e 


5228 


5325 


-19.48 


0.25 


0.000 


— 


0.19 


inubr 


11 


IC 1639 


750 


01 09 13.1 -00 55 46.4 134.223 


-63.089 


-6 


-6 


cE 


5395 


5321 


-19.50 


0.90 


0.111 


100 


0.12 


inubr 


12 


A01123-0046 


793 


01 12 15.2 -00 45 36.8 135.794 


-62.783 


-6 


5 


Sc 


10184 


10280 


-20.56 


0.70 


0.357 


87 


0.07 


inubr 


13 


A01187-0048 


892 


01 18 43.1 -00 48 22.4 139.243 


-62.468 


1 


1 


Sa 


5240 


5164 


-19.13 


2.10 


0.000 


125 


0.13 


inubr 


14 


NGC 516 


946 


01 21 30.3 +09 17 26.9 136.240 


-52.474 


-2 


-2 


SO 


2432 


2445 


-17.74 


1.50 


0.667 


44 


0.12 


inubr 


15 


A01300+1804 


1104 


01 30 00.3 +18 03 38.7 136.481 


-43.466 


10 


10 


Im 


686 


800 


-15.31 


1.20 


0.333 


5 


0.13 


inubr 


16 


A01344+2838 


1154 


01 34 28.3 +28 38 09.3 134.893 


-32.914 


20 


4 


Sbc 


7756 


7801 


-20.10 


0.90 


0.111 


130 


0.28 


inubr 


17 


A01346+0438 


1155 


01 34 31.3 +04 37 48.6 143.669 


-56.137 


15 


4 


Sbc 


3158 


3127 


-18.06 


0.90 


0.222 


166 


0.05 


inubr 


18 


A01374+1539B 


1176 


01 37 28.8 +15 39 13.5 139.725 


-45.370 


10 


10 


Im 


630 


731 


-15.02 


5.00 


0.200 


30 


0.16 


hr 


19 


NGC 695 


1315 


01 48 27.6 +22 20 07.5 140.583 


-38.231 


15 


5 


Sc 


9705 


9855 


-21.27 


0.50 


0.100 


40 


0.32 


inubr 


20 


(NGC 784) 


1501 


01 58 24.9 +28 35 42.5 140.905 


-31.586 


9 


9 


Sm 


198 


362 


-15.68 


6.80 


0.735 





0.23 


ubr 


21 


A02008+2350 


1551 


02 00 48.6 +23 50 06.7 143.373 


-35.915 


8 


8 


Sdm 


2669 


2734 


-18.15 


3.00 


0.500 


135 


0.36 


inubr 


22 


IC 195 


1555 


02 01 02.0 +14 28 11.4 147.876 


-44.632 


-2 





so/a 


3648 


3646 


-18.58 


1.50 


0.467 


135 


0.15 


inubr 


23 


IC 197 


1564 


02 01 29.6 +02 32 51.1 156.117 


-55.334 


4 


4 


Sbc 


6332 


6240 


-19.73 


1.00 


0.500 


55 


0.05 


inubr 


24 


IC 1776 


1579 


02 02 37.8 +05 52 01.6 153.887 


-52.273 


5 


5 


Sc 


3405 


3363 


-18.31 


2.30 


0.044 


— 


0.10 


inubr 


25 


A02056+1444 


1630 


02 05 41.5 +14 44 07.5 149.175 


-43.942 


20 


3 


Sb 


4405 


4392 


-18.97 


1.20 


0.500 


43 


0.17 


inubr 


26 


NGC 825 


1636 


02 05 54.7 +06 05 13.9 154.894 


-51.699 


1 


1 


Sa 


3403 


3360 


-18.21 


2.50 


0.560 


53 


0.12 


inubr 


27 


NGC 927 


1908 


02 23 55.1 +11 55 51.8 156.461 


-44.432 


5 


5 


Sc 


8258 


8191 


-20.11 


1.30 


0.000 


— 


0.32 


inubr 


28 


A02257-0134 


1945 


02 25 39.8 -01 34 14.9 168.986 


-55.318 


20 


8 


Sdm 


1762 


1714 


-16.87 


2.40 


0.625 


12 


0.04 


inubr 


29 


NGC 984 


2059 


02 31 51.6 +23 11 40.6 151.623 


-33.641 


5 


1 


Sa 


4403 


4425 


-18.78 


3.00 


0.333 


120 


0.38 


inubr 


30 


NGC 1029 


2149 


02 36 54.7 +10 34 43.5 161.227 


-43.889 








so/a 


3635 


3600 


-18.74 


1.60 


0.688 


70 


0.33 


inubr 


31 


A02464+1807 


2296 


02 46 21.2 +18 07 39.8 158.307 


-36.324 


15 


-6 


cE 


10010 


10099 


-21.92 


0.90 


0.000 


— 


0.34 


ubr 


32 


A02493-0122 


2345 


02 49 20.4 -01 22 34.7 176.063 


-51.173 


9 


9 


Sm 


1508 


1462 


-16.71 


4.50 


0.222 


— 


0.17 


inubr 


33 


NGC 1298 


2683 


03 17 41.3 -02 17 38.5 184.276 


-46.493 


-5 


—7 


E 


6528 


6386 


-19.87 


1.20 


0.083 


70 


0.20 


inubr 


34 


A03202-0205 


2704 


03 20 15.5 -02 06 01.4 184.637 


-45.871 


15 


1 


Sa 


8227 


8074 


-20.27 


1.00 


0.000 


— 


0.13 


inubr 


35 


NGC 1552 


3015 


04 17 44.7 -00 48 43.5 194.160 


-33.421 


-2 


_2 


SO 


4924 


4797 


-19.03 


2.00 


0.250 


110 


0.24 


inubr 


36 


NGC 2692 


4675 


08 53 22.1 +52 15 31.7 166.281 +40.132 


1 


1 


Sa 


3780 


4033 


-18.82 


1.40 


0.714 


165 


0.07 


inubr 


37 


A08567+5242 


4713 


08 56 44.3 +52 41 23.5 165.641 


+40.592 


3 


3 


Sb 


9036 


9233 


-21.09 


1.90 


0.316 


177 


0.01 


inubr 


38 


A09045+3328 


4787 


09 04 30.8 +33 28 40.0 191.287 +41.809 


8 


8 


Sdm 


553 


609 


-14.23 


2.30 


0.783 


6 


0.03 


inubr 


39 


NGC 2780 


4843 


09 09 39.2 +35 07 54.5 189.253 +43.077 


3 


2 


Sab 


1951 


2201 


-17.21 


1.00 


0.300 


150 


0.02 


inubr 


40 


A09125+5303 


4879 


09 12 30.6 +53 03 04.1 164.662 +42.886 


10 


10 


Im 


600 


819 


-15.09 


2.50 


0.400 


85 


0.01 


inubr 


41 


NGC 2799 


4909 


09 14 17.6 +42 12 15.0 179.536 +44.323 


9 


9 


Sm 


1882 


2165 


-16.98 


2.10 


0.762 


125 


0.00 


inubr 


42 


NGC 2824 


4933 


09 16 06.9 +26 28 52.1 201.240 +42.921 


-2 


-2 


SO 


2760 


2952 


-17.84 


1.00 


0.400 


160 


0.07 


inubr 


43 


NGC 2844 


4971 


09 18 37.9 +40 21 53.1 182.117 +45.153 


1 


1 


Sa 


1486 


1770 


-17.25 


1.90 


0.526 


13 


0.00 


inubr 


44 


NGC 3011 


5259 


09 46 44.4 +32 27 18.3 194.246 +50.484 


-2 





so/a 


1517 


1798 


-16.64 


0.90 


0.111 


52 


0.01 


inubr 


45 


NGC 3009 


5264 


09 47 01.9 +44 31 45.0 175.323 +50.032 


20 


5 


Sc 


4666 


4904 


-18.85 


0.80 


0.125 


— 


0.01 


inubr 


46 


IC 2520 


5335 


09 53 28.6 +27 27 58.0 202.394 +51.265 


15 


15 


../Pec 


1226 


1478 


-16.01 


0.70 


0.143 


— 


0.04 


inubr 


47 


A09557+4758 


5354 


09 55 42.1 +47 58 33.8 169.531 +50.736 


20 


9 


Sm 


1172 


1498 


-16.01 


2.30 


0.435 


75 


0.00 


inubr 


48 


NGC 3075 


5360 


09 56 13.7 +14 39 33.5 221.580 +47.958 


5 


5 


Sc 


3566 


3714 


-18.18 


1.20 


0.333 


135 


0.05 


inubr 


49 


A09579+0439 


5378 


09 57 55.6 +04 38 52.4 234.367 +43.385 


3 


3 


Sb 


4185 


4270 


-18.81 


1.80 


0.556 


103 


0.00 


inubr 


50 


NGC 3104 


5414 


10 00 56.4 +41 00 05.2 180.288 +53.105 


10 


10 


Im 


604 


711 


-14.70 


3.60 


0.361 


35 


0.05 


inubr 


51 


A10042+4716 


5451 


10 04 10.8 +47 15 03.3 170.003 +52.311 


10 


10 


Im 


571 


724 


-14.80 


1.60 


0.500 


103 


0.00 


inubr 


52 


NGC 3165 


5512 


10 10 55.6 +03 37 26.2 238.152 +45.447 


10 


10 


Im 


1317 


1479 


-15.78 


1.60 


0.500 


177 


0.01 


inubr 


53 


A10114+0716 


5522 


10 11 21.4 +07 16 20.2 233.886 +47.619 


5 


5 


Sc 


1228 


1396 


-15.74 


3.00 


0.400 


145 


0.00 


inubr 


54 


NGC 3179 


5555 


10 14 57.9 +41 21 52.8 178.895 +55.642 


-2 


-2 


SO 


7258 


7467 


-20.10 


2.00 


0.750 


48 


0.00 


inubr 


55 


A10171+3853 


5577 


10 17 07.4 +38 52 07.7 183.170 +56.483 


15 


9 


Sm 


2008 


2328 


-17.20 


1.00 


0.200 


100 


0.00 


inubr 


56 


NGC 3213 


5590 


10 18 33.4 +19 54 14.3 217.040 +54.882 


4 


4 


Sbc 


1412 


1684 


-16.28 


1.10 


0.273 


133 


0.06 


inubr 


57 


NGC 3264 


5719 


10 29 08.2 +56 20 27.6 153.937 +51.841 


9 


8 


Sdm 


929 


1270 


-15.72 


3.50 


0.571 


177 


0.00 


inubr 


58 


NGC 3279 


5741 


10 32 04.1 +11 27 22.1 232.621 


+54.173 


5 


5 


Sc 


1422 


1677 


-16.44 


2.80 


0.875 


152 


0.12 


inubr 


59 


A10321+4649 


5744 


10 32 05.0 +46 49 13.6 167.842 +56.917 


-6 


5 


Sc 


3338 


3639 


-18.54 


0.45 


0.111 


110 


0.00 


inubr 


60 


A10337+1358 


5760 


10 33 41.7 +13 58 15.4 229.171 +55.774 


20 


6 


Scd 


2997 


3196 


-18.09 


1.40 


0.786 


1 


0.07 


inubr 


61 


IC 2591 


5763 


10 33 48.2 +35 18 43.5 189.104 +60.232 


20 


4 


Sbc 


6755 


6958 


-19.64 


1.50 


0.467 


113 


0.04 


inubr 


62 


A10365+4812 


5791 


10 36 27.1 +48 12 29.2 164.963 +56.987 


5 


5 


Sc 


854 


1144 


-15.36 


1.60 


0.688 


50 


0.00 


inubr 


63 


A10368+4811 


5798 


10 36 47.3 +48 11 35.5 164.941 


+57.044 


5 


5 


Sc 


1534 


1902 


-16.49 


1.00 


0.780 


45 


0.00 


inubr 


64 


NGC 3326 


5799 


10 36 56.0 +05 22 06.7 242.034 +51.650 


1 


3 


Sb 


8136 


8200 


-20.31 


0.70 


0.143 


43 


0.07 


inubr 


65 


A10389+3859 


5819 


10 38 58.7 +38 58 43.2 181.424 +60.637 


4 


4 


Sbc 


10693 


10689 


-20.64 


1.60 


0.781 


120 


0.00 


inubr 


66 


A10431+3514 


5870 


10 43 10.4 +35 13 41.4 188.814 +62.141 


-1 


1 


Sa 


2032 


2365 


-17.22 


1.10 


0.000 


130 


0.00 


inubr 


67 


A10448+0731 


5892 


10 44 53.1 +07 30 54.1 241.272 +54.531 


3 


3 


Sb 


8129 


8209 


-20.01 


1.00 


0.100 


140 


0.07 


inubr 


68 


A10465+0711 


5923 


10 46 31.3 +07 10 55.7 242.157 +54.643 








so/a 


722 


560 


-14.57 


0.90 


0.556 


173 


0.04 


inubr 


69 


A10504+0454 


6003 


10 50 28.5 +04 53 51.9 246.232 +53.919 


-6 





so/a 


5793 


5891 


-19.65 


0.50 


0.000 


— 


0.13 


inubr 


70 


NGC 3454 


6026 


10 51 49.6 +17 36 36.9 226.730 +61.310 


5 


5 


Sc 


1153 


1441 


-16.00 


2.40 


0.792 


116 


0.01 


inubr 


71 


A10592+1652 


6104 


10 59 12.2 +16 52 35.9 229.786 +62.565 


4 


4 


Sbc 


2936 


3173 


-17.86 


1.50 


0.733 


50 


0.00 


inubr 



SURFACE PHOTOMETRY OF NEARBY FIELD GALAXIES 



Table 1 — Continued 



ID 


Name 


UGC 


Q1950 


<5l950 


ill 


bu 


T 


T 


type 


cz 


Vlg 


Mz 


a 


e 


PA 


A, 


data 






# 


from DSS 


(°) 


n 


selt 


new 


new 


(km/s) 


(km/s) 


mag 


1 


(1-^) 


O 


mag 




(1) 


(2) 


(3) 


(4) 


(5) 


(6) 


(7) 


(8) 


(9) 


(10) 


(11) 


(12) 


(13) 


(14) 


(15) 


(16) 


(17) 


(18) 



72 


NGC 3499 


6115 


11 00 11.9 +56 29 28.5 149.136 +55.049 


15 





so/a 


1559 


1951 


-16.78 


0.80 


0.125 


— 


0.00 


inubr 


73 


NGC 3510 


6126 


11 01 00.4 +29 09 23.0 202.364 +66.211 


9 


7 


Sd 


704 


670 


-15.29 


4.20 


0.786 


163 


0.00 


inubr 


74 


A11017+3828W 


6132W 11 01 40.6 +38 28 43.7 179.831 +65.032 


-5 


15 


BL Lac 


8887 


9101 


-21.64 


0.80 


0.250 


90 


0.00 inubr 


75 


NGC 3522 


6159 


11 04 00.8 +20 21 25.0 223.672 +65.045 


-7 


-3 


SO- 


1254 


1602 


-16.14 


1.20 


0.417 


117 


0.00 


inubr 


76 


A11040+5130 


6162 


11 04 01.2 +51 28 26.5 155.195 +58.872 


5 


5 


Sc 


2204 


2574 


-17.58 


2.50 


0.520 


88 


0.00 


inubr 


77 


IC673 


6200 


11 06 51.6 +00 10 23.8 256.744 +53.368 


1 


1 


Sa 


3851 


3982 


-18.33 


2.00 


0.600 


165 


0.10 


inubr 


78 


Al 1068+4705 


6201 


11 06 53.9 +47 05 08.5 161.608 +61.952 


15 


-3 


SO- 


7497 


7752 


-20.09 


0.70 


0.286 


110 


0.00 


inubr 


79 


A11072+1302 


6206 


11 07 12.1 +13 02 32.0 239.032 +62.232 


15 


5 


Sc 


12743 


12623 


-21.31 


0.90 


0.444 


18 


0.00 


inubr 


80 


NGC 3605 


6295 


11 14 08.6 +18 17 25.1 230.641 +66.378 


-5 


-3 


SO- 


686 


551 


-15.16 


1.20 


0.500 


17 


0.00 


inubr 


81 


A11142+1804 


6296 


11 14 13.1 +18 04 18.9 231.145 +66.294 


1 


5 


Sc 


973 


905 


-15.42 


1.30 


0.692 


166 


0.00 


inubr 


82 


NGC 3633 


6351 


11 17 51.7 +03 51 34.2 256.257 +57.958 


1 


1 


Sa 


2553 


2771 


-17.60 


1.20 


0.667 


72 


0.12 


inubr 


83 


IC692 


6438 


11 23 17.9 +10 15 45.3 249.231 +63.538 


15 


-5 


E 


1157 


1501 


-15.97 


0.80 


0.250 


125 


0.10 


inubr 


84 


A11238+5401 


6446 


11 23 52.8 +54 01 19.7 147.561 +59.140 


7 


7 


Sd 


646 


902 


-14.81 


4.10 


0.366 


10 


0.00 


ubr 


85 


A11310+3254 


6545 


11 31 05.4 +32 54 37.2 190.119 +72.312 


15 


3 


Sb 


2619 


2953 


-17.58 


1.10 


0.682 


133 


0.01 


inubr 


86 


IC 708 


6549 


11 31 16.2 +49 20 19.2 152.024 +63.461 


-7 


-7 


E.. 


9438 


9501 


-20.69 


1.40 


0.357 


175 


0.00 


inubr 


87 


A11332+3536 


6570 


11 33 10.9 +35 36 43.3 181.295 +71.917 





-3 


SO- 


1598 


1999 


-16.52 


1.20 


0.500 


123 


0.04 


inubr 


88 


A11336+5829 


6575 


11 33 40.9 +58 28 06.5 140.698 +56.274 


5 


5 


Sc 


1225 


1632 


-16.32 


2.20 


0.818 


171 


0.00 


inubr 


89 


NGC 3795A 


6616 


11 36 37.1 +58 32 44.5 140.031 +56.402 


6 


6 


Scd 


1154 


1559 


-16.30 


3.00 


0.200 


80 


0.00 


inubr 


90 


A11372+2012 


6625 


11 37 11.5 +20 12 38.8 232.798 +72.097 


20 


5 


Sc 


10964 


10891 


-20.99 


0.80 


0.125 


55 


0.00 


inubr 


91 


NGC 3795 


6629 


11 37 22.8 +58 53 24.3 139.570 +56.152 


20 


5 


Sc 


1091 


1491 


-16.29 


2.30 


0.739 


53 


0.00 


inubr 


92 


A11378+2840 


6637 


11 37 47.8 +28 39 03.9 204.276 +74.251 


-2 


-3 


SO- 


1821 


2205 


-16.76 


0.90 


0.556 


72 


0.00 


inubr 


93 


A11392+1615 


6655 


11 39 15.2 +16 15 03.7 244.030 +70.384 


15 


-2 


SO 


786 


619 


-14.71 


0.50 


0.400 


20 


0.04 


inubr 


94 


NGC 3846 


6706 


11 41 33.9 +55 18 45.4 141.998 +59.536 


20 


9 


Sm 


1396 


1810 


-16.67 


2.10 


0.143 


40 


0.00 


inubr 


95 


NGC 3850 


6733 


11 42 55.0 +56 09 51.0 140.847 +58.893 


5 


5 


Sc 


1166 


1573 


-16.11 


2.20 


0.546 


130 


0.00 


auhr 


96 


A11476+4220 


6805 


11 47 35.4 +42 21 10.0 158.913 +70.515 


15 


-2 


SO 


1033 


1418 


-15.94 


0.35 


0.286 


105 


0.00 


inubr 


97 


NGC 3913 


6813 


11 48 00.5 +55 37 55.0 140.113 +59.700 


7 


7 


Sd 


953 


1337 


-15.91 


3.00 


0.067 


165 


0.00 


nubr 


98 


IC746 


6898 


11 53 00.6 +26 10 04.1 215.437 +77.450 


20 


3 


Sb 


5027 


5274 


-18.99 


1.30 


0.731 


169 


0.00 


inubr 


99 


A11531+0132 


6903 


11 53 03.1 +01 30 55.4 273.260 +60.852 


5 


5 


Sc 


1894 


2187 


-17.11 


2.50 


0.120 


150 


0.01 


nubr 


100 


NGC 3978 


6910 


11 53 33.9 +60 48 02.6 134.848 +55.309 


4 


4 


Sbc 


9978 


10099 


-21.82 


1.70 


0.059 


90 


0.00 


inubr 


101 


A11547+4933 


6930 


11 54 42.2 +49 33 41.7 144.546 +65.511 


5 


5 


Sc 


776 


1076 


-15.44 


4.50 


0.044 


— 


0.06 


nubr 


102 


A11547+5813 


6931 


11 54 49.5 +58 12 30.4 136.375 +57.766 


15 


9 


Sm 


1175 


1588 


-16.04 


1.70 


0.353 


80 


0.00 


inubr 


103 


NGC 4034 


7006 


11 58 55.9 +69 36 09.0 129.380 +47.174 


5 


5 


Sc 


2384 


2779 


-17.53 


1.80 


0.278 


5 


0.05 


inubr 


104 


A11592+6237 


7009 


11 59 10.3 +62 36 21.1 132.686 +53.849 


10 


10 


Im 


1120 


1533 


-15.98 


1.70 


0.706 


175 


0.00 


inubr 


105 


A12001+6439 


7020A 


12 00 04.1 +64 39 17.3 131.460 +51.936 


_2 


-2 


SO 


1447 


1867 


-16.70 


1.20 


0.500 


100 


0.02 


inubr 


106 


NGC 4117 


7112 


12 05 14.1 +43 24 16.7 149.074 +71.716 


_2 


-2 


SO 


958 


1332 


-15.71 


2.50 


0.640 


18 


0.00 


inubr 


107 


NGC 4120 


7121 


12 06 03.0 +69 49 19.4 128.420 +47.124 


20 


5 


Sc 


2251 


2651 


-17.81 


1.80 


0.778 


166 


0.03 


inubr 


108 


A12064+4201 


7129 


12 06 23.2 +42 01 09.0 151.001 +72.991 


2 


2 


Sab 


927 


1284 


-15.63 


1.30 


0.385 


75 


0.00 


inubr 


109 


NGC 4141 


7147 


12 07 17.9 +59 07 38.3 132.941 +57.463 


5 


5 


Sc 


1980 


2392 


-17.11 


1.40 


0.357 


75 


0.00 


inubr 


110 


NGC 4159 


7174 


12 08 31.1 +76 24 14.1 126.126 +40.750 


20 


8 


Sdm 


1761 


2169 


-17.14 


1.50 


0.600 


35 


0.16 


inubr 


111 


NGC 4204 


7261 


12 12 42.0 +20 56 13.7 249.038 +79.503 


8 


8 


Sdm 


861 


707 


-15.24 


4.70 


0.000 


140 


0.07 


ubr 


112 


NGC 4238 


7308 


12 14 31.3 +63 41 16.5 129.380 +53.284 


5 


5 


Sc 


2771 


3159 


-18.12 


1.80 


0.750 


36 


0.03 


inubr 


113 


NGC 4248 


7335 


12 15 21.6 +47 41 13.8 138.709 +68.676 





8 


Sdm 


484 


601 


-14.83 


3.20 


0.594 


108 


0.00 


inubr 


114 


A12167+4938 


7358 


12 16 44.6 +49 37 54.9 136.403 +66.922 


5 


5 


Sc 


3639 


3992 


-18.55 


1.70 


0.706 


37 


0.00 


inubr 


115 


NGC 4272 


7378 


12 17 17.1 +30 36 59.4 186.227 +82.359 


-5 


-3 


SO- 


8453 


8690 


-20.43 


1.00 


0.100 


— 


0.07 


■auhr 


116 


NGC 4288 


7399 


12 18 10.3 +46 34 10.5 138.554 +69.891 


9 


9 


Sm 


532 


653 


-15.29 


3.00 


0.400 


130 


0.00 


inubr 


117 


NGC 4308 


7426 


12 19 26.6 +30 21 05.2 186.726 +82.890 


-5 


-2 


SO 


641 


590 


-14.72 


0.80 


0.125 


— 


0.07 


inubr 


118 


A12195+3222 


7428 


12 19 32.7 +32 22 19.9 173.298 +81.912 


10 


8 


Sdm 


1193 


1648 


-16.09 


1.30 


0.077 


— 


0.02 


wuhr 


119 


A12195+7535 




12 19 33.4 +75 35 16.4 125.447 +41.672 


-6 


-6 


cE 


21239 


21422 


-22.15 


0.42 


0.048 





0.06 


inubr 


120 


A12263+4331 


7608 


12 26 19.1 +43 30 10.2 137.407 +73.259 


10 


10 


Im 


535 


622 


-14.47 


4.00 


0.125 


63 


0.00 


ubr 


121 


A12295+4007 


7678 


12 29 34.2 +40 06 30.6 139.315 +76.671 


20 


7 


Sd 


685 


785 


-15.42 


1.60 


0.375 


88 


0.00 


inubr 


122 


A12300+4259 


7690 


12 30 01.5 +42 58 53.2 135.641 +73.951 


10 


8 


Sdm 


540 


625 


-15.18 


2.30 


0.217 


20 


0.00 


inubr 


123 


A12304+3754 


7699 


12 30 21.5 +37 53 51.7 142.269 +78.797 


6 


7 


Sd 


503 


526 


-15.26 


4.00 


0.725 


38 


0.00 


inubr 


124 


NGC 4509 


7704 


12 30 38.9 +32 22 02.1 160.567 +83.638 


15 


9 


Sm 


907 


1204 


-15.71 


1.00 


0.400 


32 


0.02 


inubr 


125 


A12331+7230 


7761 


12 33 10.2 +72 30 25.6 124.677 +44.841 


3 


3 


Sb 


6959 


7283 


-19.97 


0.70 


0.286 


100 


0.04 


inubr 


126 


A12446+5155 


7950 


12 44 39.4 +51 53 13.4 124.616 +65.499 


10 


10 


Im 


502 


694 


-14.81 


1.80 


0.278 


75 


0.00 


inubr 


127 


NGC 4758 


8014 


12 50 14.6 +16 07 11.5 304.526 +78.716 


10 


4 


Sbc 


1244 


1734 


-16.29 


3.00 


0.733 


160 


0.01 


inubr 


128 


NGC 4795 


8037 


12 52 31.4 +08 20 11.8 305.667 +70.918 


-6 


1 


Sa 


2812 


3103 


-19.08 


2.10 


0.143 


115 


0.00 


inubr 


129 


NGC 4807 


8049 


12 53 03.5 +27 47 33.2 56.822 +89.019 


-3 


-1 


S0+ 


6941 


7202 


-19.81 


0.80 


0.250 


— 


0.03 


inubr 


130 


NGC 4841B 


8073 


12 55 08.9 +28 45 10.1 78.291 +88.085 


-5 


-5 


E 


6266 


6539 


-19.49 


1.00 


0.000 


— 


0.05 


nubr 


131 


NGC 4926 


8142 


12 59 29.1 +27 53 37.0 45.608 +87.626 


-3 


-3 


SO- 


7751 


8008 


-20.05 


1.10 


0.091 


— 


0.04 


inubr 


132 


NGC 4961 


8185 


13 03 23.6 +28 00 06.6 44.531 +86.758 


6 


4 


Sbc 


2533 


2913 


-18.53 


1.60 


0.313 


100 


0.04 


nubr 


133 


A13065+5420 


8231 


13 06 31.3 +54 20 30.0 117.397 +62.868 


3 


3 


Sb 


2460 


2874 


-17.86 


1.60 


0.688 


78 


0.04 


inubr 


134 


IC 4213 


8280 


13 09 52.0 +35 56 16.0 96.861 +80.381 


5 


6 


Scd 


815 


1041 


-15.59 


2.70 


0.815 


174 


0.01 


inubr 


135 


A13194+4232 


8400 


13 19 23.3 +42 32 39.2 102.764 +73.644 


20 


6 


Scd 


3396 


3771 


-18.21 


0.80 


0.125 


44 


0.00 


inubr 


136 


NGC 5117 


8411 


13 20 35.4 +28 34 39.0 44.424 +82.929 


5 


5 


Sc 


2410 


2805 


-17.43 


2.20 


0.546 


154 


0.00 


■auhr 


137 


NGC 5173 


8468 


13 26 17.9 +46 51 00.5 104.805 +69.213 


-5 


-5 


E 


2467 


2885 


-17.93 


1.00 


0.000 


— 


0.00 


inubr 


138 


A13281+3153 


8498 


13 28 07.9 +31 52 41.5 63.136 +80.396 


3 


2 


Sab 


7320 


7607 


-20.14 


2.80 


0.679 


3 


0.03 


inubr 


139 


NGC 5208 


8519 


13 29 57.6 +07 34 23.3 330.965 +67.927 


-2 


-2 


SO 


6761 


6965 


-19.73 


1.60 


0.625 


162 


0.00 


inubr 


140 


NGC 5230 


8573 


13 33 04.8 +13 55 51.4 342.547 +73.059 


5 


5 


Sc 


6855 


7087 


-20.77 


2.10 


0.143 


— 


0.00 


inubr 


141 


A13361+3323 


8630 


13 36 11.1 +33 22 14.8 66.298 +78.214 


15 


9 


Sm 


2364 


2775 


-17.62 


1.70 


0.706 


95 


0.00 inubr 


142 


NGC 5267 


8655 


13 38 28.9 +39 02 48.4 84.634 +74.451 


3 


3 


Sb 


5941 


6265 


-19.60 


1.40 


0.643 


56 


0.00 


inubr 



JANSEN ^TAL. 



Table 1 — Continued 



ID 


Name 


UGC 


"195 


) <5l95() 


hi 


bii 


T 


T 


type 


cz 


Vlg 


Mz 


a 


€ 


PA 


A, 


data 






# 




from DSS 


n 


n 


selt 


new 


new 


(km/s) 


(km/s) 


mag 


1 


(1-^) 


O 


mag 




(1) 


(2) 


(3) 


(4) 


(5) 


(6) 


(7) 


(8) 


(9) 


(10) 


(11) 


(12) 


(13) 


(14) 


(15] 


(16) 


(17) 


(18) 



143 


A13422+3526 


8693 


13 42 15.2 +35 26 41.4 


71.649 


+76.101 


20 


4 


Sbc 


2502 


2910 


-17.55 


1.30 


0.692 


167 


0.00 


mubr 


144 


NGC 5338 


8800 


13 50 55.7 +05 27 12.6 339.653 +63.568 


-2 


-2 


SO 


777 


722 


-15.02 


2.30 


0.435 


97 


0.02 


nubr 


145 


NGC 5356 


8831 


13 52 27.7 +05 34 44.7 340.525 +63.469 


3 


3 


Sb 


1397 


1787 


-16.55 


3.00 


0.733 


15 


0.03 


nubr 


146 


A13550+4613 


8876 


13 54 57.9 +46 12 59.9 


92.664 +67.115 








SO/a 


2133 


2572 


-17.46 


0.90 


0.722 


27 


0.00 


mubr 


147 


NGC 5407 


8930 


13 58 43.6 +39 23 50.8 


77.083 


+71.200 


15 


-2 


SO 


5431 


5770 


-19.21 


1.40 


0.286 


100 


0.00 


mubr 


148 


NGC 5425 


8933 


13 58 52.4 +48 41 01.9 


95.270 


+64.791 


5 


5 


So 


2062 


2504 


-17.40 


1.90 


0.763 


127 


0.04 


mubr 


149 


A14016+3559 


8984 


14 01 38.0 +35 58 52.2 


66.632 


+72.369 


20 


-2 


SO 


3829 


4194 


-18.76 


1.30 


0.769 


35 


0.00 


mubr 


150 


NGC 5470 


9020 


14 04 01.9 +06 16 01.4 346.552 +62.359 


3 


3 


Sb 


1023 


1350 


-15.48 


2.60 


0.846 


63 


0.04 


nubr 


151 


NGC 5491 


9072A 


14 08 27.7 +06 35 59.8 348.831 +61.926 


20 


5 


Sc 


5845 


6075 


-19.92 


1.60 


0.375 


78 


0.04 


mubr 


152 


NGC 5532 


9137 


14 14 26.4 +11 02 19.5 357.962 +64.112 


-2 


-2 


SO 


7367 


7600 


-21.03 


1.60 


0.000 


148 


0.00 


mubr 


153 


NGC 5541 


9139 


14 14 28.9 +39 49 13.3 


73.541 


+68.390 


20 


5 


Sc 


7698 


8018 


-21.06 


0.90 


0.222 


4 


0.00 


mubr 


154 


NGC 5596 


9208 


14 20 24.4 +37 20 56.4 


66.131 


+68.368 


-2 


-2 


SO 


3167 


3559 


-18.07 


1.20 


0.250 


100 


0.00 


mubr 


155 


NGC 5608 


9219 


14 21 18.8 +42 00 07.5 


76.813 


+66.192 


10 


9 


Sm 


662 


966 


-15.16 


3.00 


0.433 


95 


0.00 


mubr 


156 


A14305+1149 


9356 


14 30 28.3 +11 48 52.9 


4.760 


+61.575 


20 


5 


Sc 


2234 


2598 


-17.46 


1.60 


0.500 


105 


0.04 


nubr 


157 


NGC 5684 


9402 


14 33 47.5 +36 45 38.3 


62.551 


+66.010 


-2 


-2 


SO 


4082 


4450 


-18.91 


1.90 


0.158 


105 


0.00 


mubr 


158 


NGC 5762 


9535 


14 46 18.7 +12 39 52.1 


10.617 


+58.880 


20 


1 


Sa 


1788 


2176 


-17.00 


2.00 


0.250 


140 


0.03 


mubr 


159 


A14489+3547 


9560 


14 48 55.2 +35 46 37.4 


58.761 


+63.247 


15 


15 


Pec 


1215 


1668 


-16.12 


0.80 


0.688 


65 


0.00 


mubr 


160 


A14492+3545 


9562 


14 49 13.0 +35 44 50.1 


58.674 


+63.193 


15 


15 


Pec 


1306 


1763 


-16.56 


1.10 


0.000 


30 


0.00 


nubr 


161 


IC 1066 


9573 


14 50 31.8 +03 29 59.7 358.879 +52.425 


20 


2 


Sab 


1613 


1963 


-16.83 


1.40 


0.429 


70 


0.11 


mubr 


162 


A14594+4454 


9660 


14 59 22.8 +44 53 42.0 


75.686 


+58.725 


15 


5 


Sc 


626 


976 


-15.15 


0.80 


0.563 


83 


0.05 


mubr 


163 


A15016+1037 




15 01 36.3 +10 37 55.9 


11.209 


+54.632 


15 


-6 


cE 


10921 


10955 


-21.20 


0.20 


0.000 


— 


0.07 


mubr 


164 


IC 1100 


9729 


15 05 22.5 +63 10 21.7 100.812 +47.943 


20 


6 


Scd 


6561 


6918 


-20.05 


1.00 


0.300 


60 


0.02 


nubr 


165 


NGC 5874 


9736 


15 06 27.2 +54 56 36.0 


90.482 


+52.907 


4 


4 


Sbc 


3128 


3542 


-18.50 


2.60 


0.346 


53 


0.01 


nubr 


166 


NGC 5875A 


9741 


15 07 03.1 +52 29 10.1 


86.909 


+54.147 


15 


5 


Sc 


2470 


2903 


-18.01 


0.45 


0.111 


100 


0.07 


nubr 


167 


NGC 5888 


9771 


15 11 17.4 +41 27 02.5 


68.162 


+57.768 


3 


3 


Sb 


8738 


9067 


-20.44 


1.50 


0.400 


158 


0.03 


mubr 


168 


IC 1124 


9869 


15 27 50.3 +23 48 32.3 


36.378 


+54.159 


20 


2 


Sab 


5242 


5566 


-19.14 


0.90 


0.556 


80 


0.17 


nubr 


169 


NGC 5940 


9876 


15 28 51.4 +07 37 37.9 


12.996 


+47.351 


2 


2 


Sab 


10144 


10190 


-20.74 


0.80 


0.000 


— 


0.10 


mubr 


170 


A15314+6744 


9896 


15 31 21.1 +67 43 27.5 


103.308 +42.955 


5 


5 


Sc 


6461 


6818 


-19.72 


1.60 


0.250 


10 


0.06 


in br 


171 


NGC 5993 


10007 


15 42 42.4 +41 16 37.0 


65.923 


+52.014 


3 


3 


Sb 


9578 


9747 


-21.04 


1.20 


0.250 


140 


0.06 


mubr 


172 


IC 1141 


10051 


15 47 25.6 +12 33 01.0 


22.512 


+45.805 


15 





so/a 


4458 


4757 


-18.78 


0.50 


0.100 


95 


0.11 


nubr 


173 


IC 1144 


10069 


15 49 41.5 +43 33 59.8 


69.250 


+50.414 


-3 





so/a 


12096 


12275 


-21.05 


0.70 


0.286 


100 


0.04 


mubr 


174 


NGC 6007 


10079 


15 51 01.5 +12 06 23.4 


22.509 


+44.820 


4 


4 


Sbc 


10548 


10629 


-21.03 


1.70 


0.294 


65 


0.08 


nubr 


175 


A15523+1645 


10086 


15 52 24.5 +16 45 48.3 


28.767 


+46.454 


-2 


5 


Sc 


2191 


2566 


-17.30 


0.70 


0.714 


177 


0.07 


mubr 


176 


A15542+4800 


10097 


15 54 12.8 +48 00 42.4 


75.757 


+48.796 


-2 


-2 


SO 


5996 


6361 


-19.86 


1.30 


0.154 


130 


0.05 


mubr 


177 


NGC 6020 


10100 


15 54 58.1 +22 32 52.4 


37.084 +47.814 


-7 


—7 


E.. 


4397 


4732 


-18.77 


1.40 


0.286 


140 


0.12 


mubr 


178 


NGC 6123 


10333 


16 16 39.1 +62 03 36.3 


93.481 


+41.541 








so/a 


3986 


4381 


-18.72 


0.80 


0.750 


4 


0.01 


nubr 


179 


NGC 6131 


10356 


16 20 07.7 +39 02 58.4 


62.024 


+44.988 


5 


5 


Sc 


5054 


5419 


-19.40 


1.10 


0.000 


— 


0.00 


mubr 


180 


NGC 6185 


10444 


16 31 28.1 +35 26 45.9 


57.271 


+42.480 


9 


1 


Sa 


10301 


10487 


-20.60 


1.20 


0.333 





0.05 


mubr 


181 


NGC 7077 


11755 


21 27 27.5 +02 11 38.1 


56.028 


-33.234 


-7 





so/a 


1142 


1323 


-16.35 


0.60 


0.000 


— 


0.18 


mubr 


182 


NGC 7194 


11888 


22 01 04.5 +12 23 39.8 


71.769 


-33.080 


-7 


-7 


E.. 


8139 


8242 


-20.12 


1.30 


0.308 


20 


0.27 


mubr 


183 


A22306+0750 


12074 


22 30 36.1 +07 50 23.6 


74.425 


-41.391 


15 


5 


Sc 


1995 


2129 


-17.52 


0.60 


0.333 


145 


0.33 


mubr 


184 


NGC 7328 


12118 


22 34 59.8 +10 16 17.7 


77.618 


-40.271 


2 


2 


Sab 


2827 


2949 


-18.12 


2.10 


0.667 


88 


0.23 


mubr 


185 


NGC 7360 


12167 


22 41 01.9 +03 53 21.7 


73.386 


-46.057 


15 


-5 


E 


4697 


4756 


-18.95 


0.70 


0.571 


153 


0.16 


mubr 


186 


A22426+0610 


12178 


22 42 37.2 +06 10 00.6 


75.963 


-44.620 


15 


8 


Sdm 


1925 


2043 


-17.44 


3.30 


0.485 


10 


0.15 


mubr 


187 


A22551+1931N 12265N 22 55 08.7 +19 31 22.1 


89.474 


-35.580 


15 


-2 


SO 


5682 


5795 


-18.56 


0.20 


0.250 


90 


0.15 


mubr 


188 


NGC 7436 


12269 


22 55 32.7 +25 52 56.6 


93.384 


-30.131 


-7 


-5 


E.. 


7409 


7537 


-20.22 


2.00 


0.000 


— 


0.23 


mubr 


189 


NGC 7460 


12312 


22 59 09.8 +01 59 40.6 


76.610 


-50.471 


3 


3 


Sb 


3296 


3352 


-18.51 


1.10 


0.091 


50 


0.27 


mubr 


190 


NGC 7537 


12442 


23 12 01.8 +04 13 33.8 


82.762 


-50.661 


4 


4 


Sbc 


2648 


2718 


-18.13 


2.10 


0.762 


79 


0.20 


mubr 


191 


NGC 7548 


12455 


23 12 43.7 +25 00 33.8 


96.951 


-32.688 


-2 


-2 


SO 


7925 


8035 


-20.06 


1.00 


0.200 


15 


0.32 


mubr 


192 


A23176+1541 


12519 


23 17 32.3 +15 40 46.1 


93.009 


-41.547 


20 


7 


Sd 


4380 


4472 


-19.02 


1.40 


0.714 


158 


0.11 


mubr 


193 


NGC 7620 


12520 


23 17 37.2 +23 56 50.5 


97.621 


-34.122 


6 


6 


Scd 


9565 


9811 


-21.46 


1.30 


0.077 


— 


0.24 


mubr 


194 


A23264+1703 


12620 


23 26 23.9 +17 02 00.9 


96.347 


-41.264 


-2 


-2 


SO 


6849 


6918 


-20.05 


1.40 


0.143 


— 


0.11 


mubr 


195 


IC 1504 


12734 


23 38 46.2 +03 44 25.3 


91.733 


-54.551 


3 


3 


Sb 


6306 


6307 


-19.56 


1.90 


0.737 


94 


0.21 


mubr 


196 


NGC 7752 


12779 


23 44 27.1 +29 10 52.9 106.493 


-31.346 





7 


Sd,pec 


4902 


5034 


-19.26 


0.45 


0.556 


113 


0.20 


mubr 


197 


A23514+2813 


12835 


23 51 24.1 +28 12 52.0 107.907 


-32.696 


-7 


-5 


E 


6946 


7051 


-19.88 


1.10 


0.273 





0.16 


mubr 


198 


A23542+1633 


12856 


23 54 11.8 +16 32 09.3 104.568 


-44.099 


10 


10 


Im 


1788 


1908 


-17.00 


2.60 


0.654 


12 


0.05 


mubr 



Unclassified spirals (S...?) are indicated by numeric type 20. 



SURFACE PHOTOMETRY OF NEARBY FIELD GALAXIES 



N 



50 
40 
30 
20 
10 




1 
-a) 








Mz 
Mb 


1 1 1 1 


- 


y/////A - 




Y///, 




\m 


/ 1 / 


''III/ 


1 --- 




'7A 



14 -16 -U 
M 



-20 -22 



N 




N 




N 




20 22 24 

Fig. 1 — Overview of the global properties of the selected galaxy sample. We present the number distributions as a function of a) 
absolute Zwicky (open) and B (shaded) magnitudes; b) galaxy type, for the original type used in the selection of the sample (open) 
and for the types adopted in the present analysis (shaded). Note that here and in the following figures we place the unclassified 
early type galaxies at T=— 4, as this bin is empty (we have no cD galaxies in our sample) and the proper placement at T=— 7 seems 
awkward with respect to the compact ellipticals at T=— 6; c) effective color {B — R)e, measured within the effective radius in B. d) 
the surface brightness at the effective radius in B. In panels c) and d) the open histograms represent the selected sample, and the 
shaded histograms the subsample of galaxies later than SO/a; e) the face-on (extrapolated) central surface brightness of disks and 
spheroidal/elliptical components. 



major axis diameters, a, and the ellipticities, e = 
1 — b/a, derived from the minor and major axis ra- 
tio as hsted in the UGC catalog. Column (16) gives 
the position angles of the major axis, measured from 
North through East, as given in the UGC. These po- 
sition angles and the ellipticities in column (15) were 
used (section ^.2[ ) to obtain radial intensity profiles. 
Column (17) gives the i?-filter Galactic foreground 
extinction as estimated from the Hi maps of Burstein 
& Heiles (1984) as given in the RC3 (de Vaucouleurs 
et al. 1991). The final column lists the available 
data, where abbreviations "i" , "n" , "u" , "b" , and "r" 
are used for integrated and nuclear spectra, and U, B 
and R surface photometry, respectively. Italic font 
is used where no photometric exposures are available 
in [/, B, or R\ bold-face font where the only obser- 
vation was a short photometric "snapshot" exposure 
(see section 3.1). 



To efficiently use the available telescope time, several 
more galaxies were included in our observations. The 
data for two of these, A01047-hl625 and NGC 784, 
both very late type and very nearby, are presented 
in this paper as well, but are not part of the statisti- 
cal sample. In table 1 these galaxies are shown with 
parentheses. 

In figure 1 we give an overview of the main sample 
properties, comparing the selection properties with 
the observed magnitudes, colors and types. In fig- 
ures la-d we plot for the 196 sample galaxies the 
number distributions of absolute magnitude (M^ and 
M^), morphological type (as selected and as reclas- 
sified), effective color (B — R)^, measured within the 
effective radius rf in B, and surface brightness in B 
at that effective radius. 

We prefer the surface brightness measured at the ef- 
fective radius over the (extrapolated) central surface 



JANSEN ^TAL. 



brightness, because (1) it can be measured for any 
light distribution (we need not a priori adopt a model 
for the light distribution, which might introduce ar- 
tificial differences between galaxies of different mor- 
phological type), (2) the measurement is relatively 
robust, (3) no extrapolation is involved, and (4) it 
can be readily compared with results from numeri- 
cal galaxy simulations. However, to facilitate com- 
parison with data in the literature, we also fit the 
face-on (extrapolated) central disk surface brightness 
and exponential scale length for the galaxies with a 
disk component and, after subtraction of the disk, 
the face-on central surface brightness of bulge, or 
central condensation. The bulge and elliptical cen- 
tral surface brightnesses are uncertain as they de- 
pend critically on the light distribution in the in- 
ner few arcseconds of a galaxy. The result is plot- 
ted in figure le. We note that for a pure exponen- 
tial disk the central surface brightness and the sur- 
face brightness at the effective radius are related by 
^f = ^^(0) + 1.0857 (rf/r^) + 2.5 log(l - e), with 
Tg the exponential scale length. 



MERITS AND LIMITATIONS OF THE SAMPLE 

The final sample contains 196 nearby galaxies 
with a large range of absolute magnitudes (—14 < 
M^ < —22), extending about five magnitudes fainter 
than the characteristic local galaxy luminosity in B 

(M* ~ -19.2, deLapparent et al. 1989; M* 18.8, 

Marzke et al. 1994). By the selection process we 
assure sampling of the entire range of morpholo- 
gies. Galaxies with several types of nuclear activ- 
ity (Seyfert i and Seyfert ii; BL Lac; nuclear star 
burst) are present in our sample. We also fairly sam- 
ple a range of ~1.3 magnitude in effective {B — R)e 
color and the number distribution as a function of 
color is broad. (Our selection was unbiased towards 
color.) As expected, the early type galaxies are pre- 
dominantly red while the spirals and later type galax- 
ies cover a large range in color. The distribution 
of observed surface brightness at the effective radius 
in B has a peak at 22.0 mag arcsec"^, a mean of 
22.4 mag arcsec"^, and a FWHM of 1.7 mag arcsec"^. 
The tails of the distribution, however, extend over al- 
most 10 mag arcsec"^. The early type galaxies tend 
to be brighter at the effective radius than the late 
type galaxies. The distribution of face-on central disk 
surface brightness peaks at '-^22.5 mag arcsec"^, has 
a mean of 22.0 mag arcsec"^, and a FWHM of 2.6 
mag arcsec^^. 

The sample contains several examples of low sur- 
face brightness (LSB) galaxies and galaxies contain- 
ing LSB disks, the most extreme of which are A01374- 

^The F.L. Whipple Observatory is operated by the Smithsonian 
Arizona. 



-M539B, A12263-F4331 and A11238-F5401 (but see 
also AlOl 14+0716 and IC 673 for examples of LSBs 
with bulges). Although this sample, as most magni- 
tude limited samples, is deficient in LSBs (Sprayberry 
et al. 1995; McGaugh, Schombert k Bothun 1995) 
we do not omit this part of the galaxy population. 

We do not have any examples of the very brightest 
end of the cluster luminosity function, represented 
by the brightest cluster galaxies, in our final sam- 
ple. These systems are very rare, however, in terms 
of their number frequency averaged over the entire 
field, and in terms of luminosity density. We also lack 
examples of galaxies at the very faintest end of the 
luminosity function (at M^ > —14), due to the negli- 
gible sample volume of the CfA I catalog at these faint 
absolute magnitudes. With few caveats, our sample 
is a faithful representation of the local field galaxy 
population. 



3. OBSERVATIONS, REDUCTION AND CALIBRATION 
3.1. Observations 

The photometric observations reported here were 
made with CCD cameras at the F.L. Whipple Ob- 
servatory's 1.2 m telescope^. The data were ob- 
tained during 50 dark nights between 1994 March and 
1997 March. We used both front-side and thinned 
back-side illuminated versions of Loral CCDs with 
2048x2048, 15 jum. pixels. This yields a scale of 
'^0.32" per pixel, although we usually binned the im- 
ages 2 by 2. The images cover a region ~11' square. 
For both CCDs the readout noise was ~8 e^ RMS. 

We obtained B and R images with the front-side 
illuminated CCD, typically integrating 2 x 900 sec- 
onds in B and 2 x 450 seconds in R. Beginning in 
1995 October, the back-side illuminated CCD camera 
was commissioned, allowing U exposures. We typi- 
cally integrated 900 seconds in [/, 2 x 450 seconds in 
B and 2 x 180 seconds in R with this CCD. 

The U and B filters closely follow the Johnson 
(1955) system, while the R filter follows the Cousins 
(1976) system. The B filter has a small leak at 
5600A that contributes ~0.5% to the total light for 
a fiat spectrum source. On photometric nights, we 
observed several Landolt (1992) standard star fields 
at low and high air mass for photometric calibration. 
We obtained short and long exposures to allow the 
use of standard stars at a wide range of magnitudes 
and to check the CCD linearity. At least one standard 
star field was followed throughout most of the night. 
On photometric nights, we typically obtained short 
galaxy exposures to calibrate the non-photometric 
observations. The diameters of stellar images on our 
Astrophysical Observatory, and is located on Mt. Hopkins in 



SURFACE PHOTOMETRY OF NEARBY FIELD GALAXIES 



frames are typically 1.5" to 2.0" FWHM. 

3.2. Data reduction 

The data were reduced within the IRAF environ- 
ment using a custom reduction pipeline that follows 
standard reduction techniques. The sequence of steps 
is: (1) interpolation over bad columns, dead and hot 
pixels, (2) bias subtraction using the median of the 
bias frames, followed by removal of the mean pixel 
value in the overscan region, (3) dark current sub- 
traction using a median of the dark exposures, (4) 
subtraction of scattered light from a field flattening 
lens (October 1995 data only), and (5) flat fielding, 
correcting for the pixel-to-pixel variations with dome 
flats and for the illumination variations with twilight 
flats. 

Prior to flat fielding, the consistency of the flats 
from night to night over each run was checked. The 
field flattener/dewar window was cleaned just before 
the observing run and then left undisturbed. The flat 
fields of separate nights correlate very well (frame to 
frame deviations less than 0.2%), allowing us to con- 
struct a single flat field for each filter for an entire 
run. 

Following flat fielding, the images without bright 
stars are flat to better than 0.8% overall, improving 
to better than 0.5% in the cropped central 5.3' square 
portion of the CCD used for photometric analysis 
of all but the most extended galaxies. Even in the 
cropped images the field of view is large enough for 
accurate determination of the sky level. 

Ellipses were fit to all galaxy images to obtain ra- 
dial intensity profiles using the procedures described 
in Franx et al. (1989) and J0rgensen et al. (1992), 
and references therein. Regions containing CCD de- 
fects, cosmic ray events, stars, and background or 
companion galaxies were excluded from the fit. The 
width of the fitted elliptical annuli grows by a factor 
1.1 in each radial step. This maintains a nearly con- 
stant signal-to-noise-ratio in the azimutally averaged 
intensities by compensating for the decline in surface 
brightness with radius. The fits were continued to 
the radius where only 60% of the elliptical annulus 
falls inside the image. 

We first fit the position of the galaxy center, fixing 
the position angle and ellipticity at the UGC values 
(Nilson 1973), listed in table 1. Then, with the center 
fixed to the fitted position, the ellipticity and posi- 
tion angles were fitted. In each case where the fit con- 
verged, the ellipticity and position angle in the outer 
parts of the galaxies matched the UGC values within 
the errors (see also de Jong and van der Kruit (1994)), 
independent of the filter used. We therefore adopted 
the UGC ellipticities and position angles with two 
exceptions: A12446+5155 has a position angle of 75 



rather than 5°, and Al 1336+5829 has a position an- 
gle of 171 (or -9) rather than 9°. If the UGC omits 
a position angle for a round, very disturbed, or very 
compact system, we use a position angle of 90°. The 
final radial intensity profile was then fitted with the 
galaxy center, ellipticity, and position angle fixed at 
all radii. 

Our goal is to obtain accurate photometry and in- 
ternally consistent colors and surface brightness pro- 
files, not to investigate the details of the light distri- 
bution. Ellipses will fail to adequately represent the 
isophote shapes of some of the galaxies in the sample, 
including barred galaxies and many late type galax- 
ies. In addition, many late type galaxies have ellip- 
ticities and position angles that vary with radius, and 
in some cases the isophote centers wander. 

The non-photometric data were calibrated with the 
help of the short calibration exposures obtained dur- 
ing photometric conditions. In a few cases, no pho- 
tometric image was available, and we averaged the 
photometric scaling for the bracketing images if both 
agreed to better than ~30%. These exceptions have 
been clearly marked in the figures and data tables 
presenting our surface brightness profiles and mea- 
surements (section Q). 

The sky value was determined from the mean of the 
intensities of the 5 outermost annuli. These annuli 
extend to the edge of the images and contain many 
thousands of pixels. The variance in the sky level is 
dominated by systematic errors, which we estimate 
from the peak-to-peak variation in the background 
level over the images, excluding linear gradients. The 
systematic errors in the sky level are typically 0.5%, 
except where bright neighbouring galaxies or stars 
are present. 



3.3. Calibration 

For each fiux standard star we measured instrumen- 
tal magnitudes in a 14" diameter circular aperture 
for conformity with Landolt's (1992) photo-electric 
fiux measurements. For each filter on each photomet- 
ric night we used an interactive fitting procedure to 
find the photometric zeropoint, atmospheric extinc- 
tion coefficient and color term coefficient. A night 
was declared non-photometric if: (1) we detected 
clouds or brightness fiuctuations of the guide star, 
or (2) the RMS scatter in the photometric fit to the 
standard stars exceeded 0.035, 0.028, and 0.025 mag 
in U, B, and R respectively, or (3) the scatter in the 
photometric fit was time varying. Table 2 gives typ- 
ical photometric constants for each filter and both 
CCD detectors. The sigmas in this table denote the 
spread (not the errors) of the fitted coefficients in al- 
most 2 years of standard star data for each CCD. 



J ANSEN ET AL. 



Table 2 

Average photometric constants FLWO 1994-1997 



filter 


CCD 


zeropoint 


extinction coeff. 


color term coeff. 








pz 


a-pz 


pe 


O-pe 


pc 


O-pc 


color 


U 


thick 


19.97 


0.08 


0.482 


0.039 


-0.049 


0.007 


U - 


-R 


U 


thin 


21.76 


0.06 


0.482 


0.039 


-0.046 


0.006 


U - 


- R 


B 


thick 


21.61 


0.09 


0.252 


0.022 


-0.067 


0.010 


B- 


-R 


B 


thin 


23.24 


0.05 


0.252 


0.022 


-0.024 


0.008 


B- 


-R 


ya 


thick 


21.93 


— 


0.112 


— 


+0.008 


— 


B- 


-V 


ya 


thin 


23.04 


0.08 


0.151 


0.034 


+0.043 


0.015 


B- 


-V 


R 


thick 


22.10 


0.11 


0.115 


0.020 


+0.035 


0.005 


B- 


-R 


R 


thin 


23.14 


0.06 


0.115 


0.020 


+0.027 


0.007 


B- 


-R 


ja 


thin 


22.92 


0.05 


0.053 


0.023 


-0.085 


0.012 


R- 


-I 



" V and / filter standards were observed for co-sdieduled 
monitoring programs. 

The radial intensity profiles were then photometri- 
cally calibrated, solving simultaneously the calibra- 
tion equations for B and R, or U and R, using (B—R) 
and (U — R) color terms, respectively. The details of 
this procedure are found in appendix |^. 

Finally, the calibrated surface brightness profiles 
were combined if multiple exposures were available. 
Because the repeated exposures were frequently ob- 
tained on different nights and even on different ob- 
serving runs, the scatter in the individual profiles al- 
lows us to estimate the photometric errors. Where 
the variance of the calibrated profiles exceeds the for- 
mal photometric errors (see appendix |^), we adopt 
this larger variance as our photometric error. In most 
cases this applies only to the inner few arcseconds of 
the profiles, where seeing changes (1.2-2.5") cause up 
to ~0.2 mag arcsec"^ variations between individual 
profiles. We conclude that the shapes of the derived 
surface brightness profiles are reliable. 

The radial surface brightness profiles were cor- 
rected for Galactic exinction, estimated from the 
Hi maps of Burstein & Heiles (1984) and using ex- 
tinction ratios Aji/Ab = 0.588 and Ajj/Ab = 1.156 
(Rieke & Lebofsky 1985) to derive the corrections 
in R and U. No corrections for cosmological effects 
(dimming and ^-correction) were applied. 

The profiles were used to measure isophotal and 
fractional magnitudes, and corresponding radii and 
colors (section pT|). 

For our photometric analysis it sufficed to match 
the individual surface brightness profiles of a galaxy. 
The individual images were not shifted to a common 
center, nor rebinned to a common position angle and 
pixel scale. Stars were not removed from the images. 
Also, we did not remove residual linear gradients in 
the background as they dropped out in the fitting 
of the ellipses. Although, in principle, these data 
are suitable for two-dimensional bulge/bar /disk de- 
convolutions and other detailed studies of the light 
distribution, at present the data are not in an easily 



distributable format. 

3.4. Total magnitudes: extrapolation to infinity 

Following Han (1992) we extrapolated the radial 
surface brightness profiles to infinity to obtain total 
magnitudes, under the assumption that the light at 
large radii can be approximated by an exponential 
disk. Exponentials were fit to the outer parts of each 
radial surface profile over a 2.172 magnitude inter- 
val ending 0.3 mag arcsec"^ above the 1 a limiting 
isophote. For a purely exponential profile this sur- 
face brightness interval corresponds to exactly two 
exponential scale lengths. Our profiles are sufficiently 
deep that the details of the light fall off do not seri- 
ously affect the result. We might underestimate the 
luminosity of an i?^'^ profile elliptical by ~0.1 mag 
with this procedure. For disk galaxies the extrapola- 
tion procedure should work very well unless the disk 
is truncated near the outer fit interval. However, we 
found no convincing evidence for disk truncation in 
our sample. Furthermore, the galaxies requiring the 
largest corrections from isophotal to total magnitude 
follow an exponential profile to the faintest regions 
sampled in our data. The average limiting isophotes 
for our data are fi^=26.7, ^^=27.2, and ^^=26.1, 
with a spread of ~0.7 mag arcsec"^. 

Absolute magnitudes were calculated using the to- 
tal magnitudes and the galaxy recessional velocities 
with respect to the centroid of the Local Group, cor- 
recting for Virgo infall. We used the infall model 
of Kraan-Korteweg et al. (1984) which has the Lo- 
cal Group falling in Virgo at 220 km s^^; no other 
corrections for peculiar motion were applied. 

3.5. Evaluation of the data quality 
INTERNAL CONSISTENCY AND ERROR ANALYSIS 

For most galaxies, more than one long exposure per 
filter is available. To evaluate the internal accuracy 
of our photometry we compare total and isophotal 
magnitudes measured in the radial surface brightness 
profiles derived from the individual exposures. In the 
many cases where we compare data from before Oc- 
tober 1995 with later observations, we compare mea- 
surements obtained with different cameras. 

We find RMS differences between individual mea- 
surements of the total magnitude (expressed in mag- 
nitudes and in units of the error of measurement) of 
0.05 mag (OMau), 0.03 mag (0.72o-b) and 0.03 mag 
{0.66aji) in U, B and R, respectively. For the major- 
ity of the sample, however, individual measurements 
agree to better than the values quoted above; typical 
values would be 0.030, 0.013, and 0.012 mag in U, B 
and R. This result is consistent with the estimated 
accuracy based on the errors in the fitted zeropoints 



10 SURFACE PHOTOMETRY OF NEARBY FIELD GALAXIES 



"fig2.jpg 



V 



A 600 dpi postscript version of this preprint, including all 
figures and the atlas of galaxy images and radial profiles, can 
he retrieved from URL fittp://www. astro. rug. nl/'^ nfgs/ 



Fig. 2 — Comparison of our surface brightness profiles and profiles pubfished by other authors. The difi^erence A/i is in the sense 
(our profiles - literature profiles). Offsets in photometric zeropoint are indicated where applied. As an aid in distinguishing signif- 
icant differences between profiles we plot la deviations as thin vertical bars. Key to the abbreviations used: SB'99=Swaters and 
Balcells (1999), TVPHW'96=Tully et al. (1996), dJvdK'94=de Jong and van der Kruit (1994), PDDIC'90=Peletier et al. (1990), 
and vdK'87=van der Kruit (1987). 



JANSEN ET^L. 



11 



and in the photometric scahng of non-photometric 
exposures. The measured differences do not depend 
on galaxy color, morphological type, date of obser- 
vation, absolute magnitude, nor on effective surface 
brightness. 

A more demanding test of our photometry, how- 
ever, is a comparison with surface photometry pub- 
lished by other authors. 

COMPARISON WITH OTHER AUTHORS 

Our sample has 16 galaxies in common with the 
dwarf galaxy sample of S waters & Balcells (in prep.; 
hereafter SB99), most of which were observed by 
these authors in R only; they observed only two of 
the 16 in B. Rob Swaters kindly provided us with 
his surface brightness profiles, allowing us to evaluate 
the external accuracy of our photometry. The results 
are presented in figure 2. We find good agreement 
for all galaxies that were observed under photometric 
conditions in both studies. Where SB99 note that 
cirrus was present (Swaters 1998, private comm.), we 
are able to compare the shape of the two sets of pro- 
files after applying an offset (see figure text). Where 
necessary, we correct the SB99 results to account for 
a different assumed ellipticity; this correction never 
exceeded ~10%. 

We have 6 galaxies in common with another re- 
cent study of galaxies in the Ursa Major cluster 
(Tully et al. 1996; hereafter TVPHW96). These au- 
thors present B, R, I and K data. Marc Verheijen 
kindly provided us with tables of the data plotted in 
TVPHW96. Here again the photometric zeropoints 
agree well. In the worst cases, the surface brightness 
profiles at very large radii deviate by a few tenths of a 
magnitude per square arcsecond. For Al 1547-1-4933 
our photometry is not very deep, and the R profiles 
of SB99 and TVPHW96 seem to be of higher quality. 

We also show comparions for a small number 
of galaxies in common with Peletier et al. (1990, 
PDDIC90), de Jong & van der Kruit (1994, 
dJvdK94), and the earlier photographic work of 
van der Kruit (1987). Comparisons with Kent (1988) 
for NGC 2844 and Patterson & Thuan (1996, PT96) 
for A12263-I-4331, are not shown in figure 2, but are 
poor. We note that our R profile of A12263-F4331 
agrees well with SB99. 

4. PHOTOMETRIC RESULTS 

4.1. Data presentation 

Here we describe our primary data products, galaxy 
images and radial profiles of surface brightness and 
color, and present our photometric measurements. 
For 198 galaxies, our atlas includes logarithmically 
scaled renditions of the B images, B surface bright- 
ness profiles, and plots of (U—B) and (B — R) colors 



as a function of radius (figure 3). The galaxies have 
been sorted by morphological type, and within each 
type by blue luminosity. 

The radial profiles are not corrected for seeing, and 
are not a faithful representation of the surface bright- 
ness at small radii less than a few arcseconds. In 
some cases the inner part of a surface brightness pro- 
file appears to flatten over a larger region than that 
affected by seeing. This extended flattening results 
from a bar, irregularly distributed central star for- 
mation, dust, or multiple nuclei. Notes on individual 
galaxies and their radial profiles are collected in Ap- 
pendix ^. 

The photometric measurements are collected in 
table 3. Columns (1) through (3) list the galaxy 
identifications. Column (4) gives the distances in 
Mpc derived from the Virgocentric flow corrected 
velocities with respect to the centroid of the Local 
Group (column (12) of table 1), assuming Ho=100 
km s~^ Mpc^^. Columns (5) and (6) list the B ap- 
parent and absolute total magnitudes. In columns 
(7) and (8) we give the elliptical radii, r^, at 
which the surface brightness has dropped to /ig=26 
mag arcsec"^ and the corresponding isophotal mag- 
nitude, i?26- Columns (9) and (10) list the effective 
(i.e. half-light) elliptical radius in B, r^ , and the sur- 
face brightness, //^, at that radius. Columns (11) and 
(12) contain the effective (U — B) and {B — R) colors 
as measured within the effective radii in B. The final 
two columns list the color differences, A ([/ — 5)25-75 
and A(B—R)25-75, between the inner and outer parts 
of the galaxies, as defined below. 

Several authors have investigated the Zwicky mag- 
nitude scale. Bothun & Cornell (1990) showed for 
a sample of 107 spiral galaxies with mz > 14.0 that, 
although Zwicky magnitudes are not isophotal magni- 
tudes, the scatter around isophotal magnitudes vary- 
ing from B22 to B27 is of the order of 0.3 mag. In 
the mean, mz corresponds to -B26 with a scatter of 
0.31 mag. In figure 4a we plot the isophotal mag- 
nitudes measured within the elliptical aperture cor- 
responding to the /ig=26 mag arcsec"^ isophote ver- 
sus the photographic Zwicky magnitudes. We find 
for our sample a similar correspondence between mz 
and -B26 with observed RMSs of 0.30 mag for galaxies 
with m^z < 14 and of 0.42 mag for m,z > 14. Using 
total magnitudes instead of B2G (figure 46) gives a 
nearly identical result. Figure 4c shows that there 
is a relation between the difference {m^z — -B26) a-nd 
i?26 for mz > 14: Zwicky tends to overestimate the 
magnitude (i.e. underestimate the brightness) of the 
brighter galaxies and underestimate the magnitudes 
of the fainter ones. The dependence of the magnitude 
difference on galaxy type is weak, with a very large 



12 SURFACE PHOTOMETRY OF NEARBY FIELD GALAXIES 



Atlas of images and radial profiles — pages 12 through 46 
('fig3_01.jpg" through "fig3_35.jpg") 

A 600 dpi postscript version of this preprint, including all 
figures and the atlas of galaxy images and radial profiles, can 
he retrieved from URL fittp://www. astro. rug. nl/'^ nfgs/ 



Fig. 3 — The atlas of images and radial profiles. Greyscale renditions of a i? filter image and the radial dependence of the surface 
brightness in U, B, R (top panel) and corresponding colors (bottom panel) are presented for each of the observed galaxies. The 
galaxies have been ordered according to their morphological type and per type according to their absolute B magnitude (both given 
in the images). North is up and East is to the left. The original CCD images were much larger than the portion centered on the 
galaxies presented here. The image scale is given by a scale bar of the indicated number of kpc (assuming Ho = 100 km s~^ Mpc~^), 
and is given on the top axis of the radial profile plots for reference. On the ordinate of the radial profile plots r denotes the elliptical 
radius in arcseconds. The extrapolation of the surface brightness profiles beyond the limiting isophote (see text) is indicated by 
grey lines. The effective radius in B is indicated by a small vertical arrow. Shallow profiles (only short photometric exposures are 
available) are indicated by (s), truncated profiles (due to overlapping neighbours or bright stars close to a galaxy) are indicated 
by (t), and profiles with uncertain photometric zeropoints by (z) or (z!). The names of the two galaxies not part of the statistical 
sample are placed in parentheses. 
Compact ellipticals (page 12) through Irregulars (page 46). 



16 



15 



tiO 



14 



13 



: a) 



JANSENET^L. 

I I -1 16 



1 p [■'•" I* I \ \ \ \ I \ \ \ \ \ L 

12 13 14 15 

Bze (mag) 



16 



15 



tiO 

ta 



14 



13 



47 



: b) 



1 p Liil I \ \ \ \ I \ \ \ \ \ L 

12 13 14 15 

^t.t (mag) 



16 




SB 

B 



I 



1.5 


- d) 


• 


• 


' i- 


1 


• 


* 


• 


- 


0.5 

0.5 


• • 

« m 

• 

: • 


* * 

t ■ • 

■ • • 

• • 

• • • • 5 


• 

: • • 
• ••• 


•_ 


. 1 • 


•ii::i 

!::'! 


1 • 






• 






- 


-1 








1 r 



10 



15 



Fig. 4 — Comparison of photographic Zwicky magnitudes and a) 526 isophotal magnitudes, and b) total B magnitudes. For 
mz brighter than 14 the observed RMS is 0.30 in both cases; for mz > 14 the RMS is 0.42 and 0.45 mag for isophotal and total 
magnitudes, respectively, c) Difference mz — B26 as a function of £26- For mz > 14 this difference is correlated with isophotal 
magnitude, d) niz — B26 as a function of galaxy type. A weak trend of larger differences towards later galaxy type may be discerned, 
but the scatter on this trend is large. 



scatter: Zwicky magnitudes for late type galaxies 
tend to be somewhat overestimated, while those for 
early type galaxies are underestimated. This depen- 
dence on morphological type was also inferred by 
Bothun & Cornell (1990) based on weak trends of 
(mz — B2q) with a light concentration parameter and 
average surface brightness in their sample. 

4.2. Properties of our sample 

In Figure 5 a we plot the distribution of total ab- 
solute B magnitudes as a function of numeric galaxy 
type. We show all galaxies, including active galax- 
ies (starbursts or active galactic nuclei (AGN)). The 
range in luminosity and type is large (cf. figure 1), 
and galaxies of each type are distributed over a large 
range in absolute magnitude. However, the lack of 
intrinsically bright {Mb ^ —19) late type spirals and 
irregular systems (T > 6) , and of low luminosity early 
and intermediate type spiral galaxies (1 < T < 5) is 
evident. This corresponds to the type-magnitude re- 
lation for spiral galaxies later than Sa found by other 
authors (see Sandage & Binggeli 1984, their figure 1). 



Our sample does include a number of low luminos- 
ity early type SO and elliptical systems. The BL Lac 
galaxy Mrk 421 and the Seyfert I galaxies are amongst 
the intrinsically brightest galaxies in our sample. 

In figure 56 we plot the distribution of the effec- 
tive (B — R) color (measured within the effective ra- 
dius in B) as a function of galaxy type. The bulk of 
the galaxies become progressively bluer towards later 
types. This is not a new result, but the scatter on this 
trend is surprisingly small {a{B — R)e = 0.19 mag). 
Nonetheless, there are examples of very blue early- 
type and reddish late-type galaxies. The next panel 
shows that the blue early type galaxies tend to be low 
luminosity systems. If redshifts are available, color 
may be used to estimate a galaxy's broad type class 
(E,S,Irr) to a similar precision (--^5 T types) as mea- 
sures of galaxy asymmetry and concentration of the 
light (Abraham et al. 1996; see also Jansen et al. (in 
prep.) for an application of that method to our sam- 
ple). This result is remarkable if not entirely new (de 
Vaucouleurs 1977; Tinsley 1980). 



48 



SURFACE PHOTOMETRY OF NEARBY FIELD GALAXIES 



In figure 5 c the distribution of effective galaxy 
colors is given as a function of absolute B magni- 
tude. Luminous systems tend to be redder than 
fainter ones. This is a relationship well-established 
for early type galaxies (e.g. Sandage & Visvanathan 
1978; Peletier et al. 1990; Ellis et al. 1997). The 
scatter in color for all galaxy types combined is larger 
{a{B — R)e = 0.23 mag) than that for the color-type 
relation. The scatter for the separate type classes E- 
SO, SO/a-Sab, Sb-Sc and Scd-Irr is 0.10, 0.15, 0.17 
and 0.13 mag (median absolute deviation (MAD)), 
respectively. It is striking that ellipticals, SO's, and 
early type spiral galaxies occupy a different region 
in the plot than the late type spiral and irregular 
galaxies. The intermediate type spirals can be found 
mixed with both early and late type systems. The 
two distributions are offset from one another by --^0.4 
mag in {B — R)e color, but there is a large overlap. 
This result persists if total colors are used or colors 
measured in the region between the radii containing 
25% and 75% of the light in B. 

Figure 5d is the color-color diagram of effective 
[U — B) versus (B — R) colors. The bulk of the nor- 
mal galaxies follow a relation with only a small scatter 
(Tinsley 1980). The "abnormal" galaxies (harboring 
star bursts or an active nucleus, or interacting with 
another galaxy) show a much larger scatter (Larson 
&: Tinsley 1978; Tinsley 1980). Again, we see that 
late and early type galaxies tend to occupy different 
regions in the plot, with early type galaxies located 
at redder colors. The relations followed by early and 
late type systems differ in slope, with the early type 
galaxies following a steeper slope. The dust extinc- 
tion vector points nearly along the relation followed 
by the intermediate and late type spirals and irregu- 
lar systems. Starburst galaxies tend to lie below and 
to the left of the main relation, i.e. at bluer (U — B) 
colors for a given {B — R) color. 

In the following plots, figures 5e and /, we will plot 
only measurements for the 168 normal (non-AGN, 
non-starburst) galaxies in our sample with high qual- 
ity photometry. Figure 5e shows the (trivial) rela- 
tion, that larger galaxies are more luminous. We plot 
the logarithm of the effective radius in kpc as a func- 
tion of absolute magnitude. As more strongly concen- 
trated systems have smaller effective radii at a given 
absolute magnitude, we expect the early type galaxies 
and spirals with significant bulges to follow a relation 
offset from that followed by later type systems. In- 
deed, we find that galaxies fainter than M^ ^^ —19 
show a clear separation according to type. For the 
brightest systems, M^ < —19, this separation is not 
clear. Lower surface brightness galaxies lie above the 
mean relation for a given absolute magnitude and 
given type. 



In figure 5/ we plot the average R surface brightness 
within the effective radius, u^^ n, as a function of 
numeric galaxy type. The light distribution in early 
type galaxies is more concentrated (i.e. brighter in 
their inner parts) than that in later type galaxies. For 
spiral galaxies there is a strong trend towards fainter 
/U^ B at later types, consistent with a decreasing con- 
tribution of bulges. There is no clear trend within the 
late type spirals and irregulars. A similar conclusion 
is reached if the average B surface brightness within 
the effective radius is used, but the trend is somewhat 
less pronounced. 

We now explore the radial color gradient in our 
sample galaxies. We measure (B — R) in the central 
region of the galaxy that contains 25% of the light, 
{B — R)2^, and in the region that contains the next 
50% of the light, {B-R)2^_^^ . We define A{B - 
^) 25-75 as the difference between these two measure- 
ments: (B-i?)25_75 - {B-R)^^ . A{U - 5)25-75 IS 
defined similarly. If A{B — R)25-75 is negative, the 
inner parts of the galaxy are redder than the outer 
parts. 

Figure 6a is a plot of A{B — R)25-75 against galaxy 
type for the 168 "normal" galaxies. The median color 
difference values for each type have been connected by 
solid lines in this plot. The color difference between 
the inner and outer parts of a galaxy remains fairly 
constant for most of the early type galaxies (T < 0): 
the inner parts are on average 0.09 mag (with a range 
of ~0.15 mag) redder than the outer parts. Mov- 
ing from so/a to Sa, this difference becomes larger. 
The centers of spiral galaxies are redder by 0.18 mag, 
on average (with a range of ~0.30 mag), than their 
outer parts. The color differences decrease for late 
type spirals, reflecting the decreasing prominence of 
bulges and the more extended star formation. The 
inner parts of irregulars can be either bluer or red- 
der than the outer parts. We will return to this issue 
below. 

The bluing of galaxies at larger radii is not a new 
result (Sandage 1972; Persson, Frogel and Aaron- 
son 1979; de Jong 1996). Recently, however, Tully 
et al. (1996) describe an absolute magnitude depen- 
dent behavior for galaxies in the Ursa Major clus- 
ter. These authors find that galaxies brighter than 
Ms ~ —17 become bluer with radius, and that fainter 
galaxies show the opposite behavior. We confirm this 
result (figure 6b), although the transition from a blu- 
ing trend with radius to a reddening trend may oc- 
cur at a fainter limit. We find that galaxies brighter 
than Mb = — 17 are almost always redder in their in- 
ner parts, while galaxies fainter than Mb ~ — 17 are 
equally likely to redden or blue with radius. Panel c 
confirms that the majority of the galaxies that show 



JANSENET^L. 



49 



0.5 





5r0.5 



a) 



-22 - 



^^-20 



-If 

to 



8 



It'* 



* -^ ^ ; 



t» 



16 
14 



-5 



**l* 



10 



d) 



0.5 



(B-R)e 



A,,-l mag 

I \ \ \ \ L 

1.5 
(mag) 



15 





1 -e) 



o 
ttO.5 



Da aj 






on 
o 

2^-0.5 - 






•it- 



-14 -16 -If 



I I I I I i~ 
-20 -22 



Mg (mag) 



(0 



1.2 

CD 

I 

P. 0.8 - 



0.4 







1 - 


:c) 




: 


- 


^ ^°°* 0° 


- 


— 


.v;fiS'^°' 


— 


Q 


^* ^%^v^ 


- 


A 
O " 


* V * * * i 


: 








- 




- 


" 


* 


~ 


- 


* 


- 


"ill 


1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 


1 - 



-14 -16 -18 -20 - 
M„ (mag) 



22 



CO 



i 











' ' L 


18 


J) 

O 






- 


20 


" Og gi 

- B°8| 
_ o°°8 


A A 
=> A A ■*■ A 

* * X * * 


-!f_ 


22 




4 * 


4 


_ 




- 


*^ 




- 


24 


~i 1 1 1 1 


1 1 1 1 1 1 1 


t , , 


, , 1- 



10 



15 



Fig. 5 — Photometric properties of the sample. Points are coded according to type as follows. For the normal galaxies, ellipti- 
cals and SO's (T < 0) are indicated by open circles, early type spirals (0 < T < 3) by open triangles, intermediate type spirals 
(3 < T < 6) by solid triangles and late type spirals and irregulars (T > 6) by asterixes. In the first four panels, galaxies with 
active nuclei (AGN) are indicated by crosses (Sy I, Sy ll and BL Lac), starburst galaxies by open stars, and the few galaxies with 
uncertain photometric zeropoint by small symbols. 

a) Total absolute B filter magnitudes as a function of numeric morphological type. Apart from the group of faint early type galaxies, 
the well-known trend of absolute magnitude with type — later type galaxies get progressively fainter — is evident, b) Effective 
(B — R) colors as a function of type. Galaxies become progressively bluer towards later types, c) Effective (B — R) colors versus 
total absolute B magnitude. Brighter galaxies tend to be redder, d) Color-color plot of effective (U — B) versus (B — R) colors. 
Apart from the active ones, the galaxies lie on a tight relation. Note that this is the first such plot for a sample so diverse in 
properties. The interstellar extinction vector is indicated, e) Effective radii in B versus total absolute B magnitude. Apart from 
the (trivial) relation between galaxy size and luminosity, we find a clear separation in type at a given magnitude for Mb > —19. 
Lower surface brightness galaxies lie above the mean relation for a given absolute magnitude and given type, f) Effective i?-filter 
surface brightnesses measured within the effective radii in B as a function of type. Among the spiral galaxies a clear trend towards 
fainter {fi )^<j,b going to later types is visible. 



a reddening with radius are blue, but that many red- 
der systems shows this behaviour as weh. Panel d 
identifies these systems as being physically smaller 
than average, while panel a shows that there is no 
preference towards morphological type. These results 
and inspection of the images in the atlas (e.g. IC 692 
(E), A02257-0134 (Sdm), and A09125+5305 (Im)) 
suggest that star formation is the driving force in 
this reddening-with-radius trend; in large, luminous 
galaxies the star formation is stronger in the outer 
parts, while in smaller, fainter systems star forma- 
tion may occur anywhere. In the latter case, a single 
Hll -region can dominate the colors and its location 
may determine the radial color trend. 



5. SUMMARY 

We have completed a photometric and spectropho- 
tometric survey of ~200 nearby galaxies of all mor- 
phological types and with a range of over 8 mag- 
nitudes in absolute B magnitude, with the goal of 
studying the variation in current star formation rates, 
star formation histories and metallicities as a function 
of galaxy type and luminosity. With this survey we 
extend the work of Kennicutt (1992) to lower lumi- 
nosity systems. The U,B,R surface photometry will 
aid our interpretation of the spectrophotometry. 

Here we have described the selection of our sample, 
the photometric observations and our data reduction 
techniques. We have presented our photometric data. 



50 



SURFACE PHOTOMETRY OF NEARBY FIELD GALAXIES 



0.5 



6fl 

CO 






-0.5 - 



-a) 




10 



15 



0.5 



6fl 

CO 



K 



- 



-0.5 



-b) 


1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 


- 


- 


-IfA 


- 


- 


* o 


- 




C^C ^ X A A 




II 


A aA 


- 


- 


A A ^ A 


- 






, 



14 



16 



-18 -20 
(mag) 



-22 



0.5 



6fl 

CO 






-0.5 



-c) 



*cf° 



A ** % ' 



* * c^ 



"#a' 



'4- 



* V A ^ 



A ^<*A 



■a^ 



J \ \ \ I \ \ \ I \ \ L 

0.5 1 1.5 

(B-R)^ (mag) 



0.5 



6fl 

CO 






-0.5 



T 






a'^a 



i"*A 



-1 - 



J \ \ \ I \ \ \ I I I \ \ \ \ L_ 

0.5 0.5 1 

ioiog(rf) (kpc) 



Fig. 6 — Color differences between inner and outer parts, a) The color difference A{B — i?)25-75 (see text) as a function of type. 
The median color difference values have been connected by solid lines. The disappearance of a significant bulge going from early 
type spirals towards later types causes the strong trend for T> 0. b) A(B — i?)25-75 as a function of total absolute B magnitude. 
Note that the galaxies fainter than Ms ~ — 16 are equally likely to become redder with radius as they are to become bluer, c) 
A(B — R)25-75 as a function of effective (B — i?). Only a small majority of the galaxies showing a reddening trend with increasing 
radius is blue, d) A{B — i?)25-75 as a function of effective radius in B. Galaxies showing a reddening trend with radius are 
intrinsically small systems. 



including an atlas of galaxy images with radial pro- 
files of surface brightness and (U — B) and (B — R) 
colors, and tables of photometric measurements. The 
spectrophotometry will be presented in a compan- 
ion paper. Our surface photometry is consistent with 
previous published work in almost all cases where a 
comparison is possible, and the exceptions are de- 
scribed. 

We find a strong trend of {B — R)e color with mor- 
phological type, with later type galaxies becoming 
progressively bluer. The observed scatter on this 
trend is 0.19 mag, which is smaller than the 0.24 mag 
scatter on the color-magnitude trend where intrinsi- 
cally fainter systems tend to be bluer than brighter 
systems. Estimating a galaxy's broad type class 
(E,S,Irr) from its color can, therefore, be as accurate 
as estimates based on galaxy asymmetry and central 
concentration (Abraham et al. 1996). We find that 
color-magnitude relations are useful for early type 
systems and to a lesser degree for very late type sys- 



tems, but not useful for intermediate type spirals. A 
color-color plot of (U — B)g versus {B — R)e shows a 
well defined relation with small scatter, considering 
the wide range in galaxy types, luminosities and col- 
ors in the sample. 

Galaxies brighter than M^ = —17 are almost al- 
ways reddest in their inner parts, but half the galaxies 
fainter than M^ = — 17 are bluest in their inner parts. 
The total scatter in the radial color difference is large 
(~0.5 mag). Early and late type galaxies behave 
similarly and we conclude that low luminosity dwarf 
galaxies forming stars in their inner parts account for 
the reddening with radius. Tully et al. (1996) find 
that faint blue galaxies in the Ursa Major cluster be- 
have similarly. 

Both the average difference in color between the in- 
ner and outer parts of a galaxy and the range in color 
difference from galaxy to galaxy are smaller in early 
type galaxies than in spirals. 



JANSENET^L. 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 



51 



This work was supported by grants from the University of Groningen, the Leiden Kerkhoven-Bosscha Fund, 
the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO), and by the Smithsonian Institution. RAJ thanks 
the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics and the F.L. Whipple Observatory for hospitality during nu- 
merous visits, when all of the observations and part of this work was done. We thank C. Briceho, N.A. Grogin, 
K.K. McLeod, and T. Groner for giving us some of their observing time. We acknowledge comments made by 
the referee, Dr. G.D. Bothun, which helped to clarify some aspects of this paper. 



REFERENCES 



Abraham, R. C, Tanvir, N. R„ Santiago, B. X., Ellis, R. S., 

Glazebrook, K., & van den Bergh, S. 1996, MNRAS, 279, 

L47 
Binggelli, B., Sandage, A., & Tammann, G. A. 1985, AJ, 90, 

1759 
Bothun, G. D., & Cornell, M. E. 1990, AJ, 99, 1004 
Burstein, D., & Heiles, C. 1984, ApJS, 54, 33. 
Cousins, A. W. J. 1976, MmRAS, 81, 25 

de Jong, R. S., & van der Kruit, R C. 1994, A&AS, 106, 451 
de Jong, R. S. 1996, A&A, 313, 377 
de Lapparent, V., Geller, M. J., & Huchra, J. P. 1989, ApJ, 

343, 1 
de Vaucouleurs, G. 1977, in: The Evolution of Galaxies and 

Stellar Populations, eds. B. M. Tinsley & R. B. Larson, Yale 

University Observatory, New Haven, p. 43 
de Vaucouleurs, G., de Vaucouleurs, A., Corwin, H. G. Jr., 

Buta, R. J., Paturel G^ & Fouque, P. 1991, Third Refer- 
ence Catalog of Bright Galaxies, Springer- Verlag. New York 

(RC3) 
Ellis, R. S. 1997, ARA&A, 35, 389 
Ellis, R. S., Small, L, Dressier, A., Couch, W. J., Oemler, 

A., Jr., Butcher, H., & Sharpies, R. M. 1997, ApJ, 483, 582 
Fabricant, D., Cheimets, P., CaldweU, N., & Geary, J. 1998, 

PASP, 110, 79 
Franx, M., Illingworth, G., & Heckman, T. 1989, AJ, 98, 538 
Han, M. 1992, ApJS, 81, 35 
Hopp, U. 1999, A&AS, 134, 317 
Huchra, J. P., Davis, M., Latham, D., & Tonry, J. 1983, ApJS, 

52, 89 (CfA I) 

1997, {GfA Redshift Gatalog, version Feb U 1997) 

Jansen, R. A., Franx, M., Fabricant, D. G., & Caldwell, N. 

1999, in preparation 
Johnson, H. L. 1955, Ann. Astrophys., 18, 292 
J0rgensen, I., Franx, M., & Kjaergaard, P. 1992, A&AS, 95, 489 
Kennicutt, R. C, Jr. 1992a, ApJ, 388, 310 



Kennicutt, R. C, Jr. 1992b, ApJS, 79, 255 

Kent, S. M. 1988, AJ, 96, 514 

Koo, D., & Kron, R. 1992, ARA&A, 30, 613 

Kraan-Korteweg, R. C, Sandage, A., & Tammann, G. A. 1984, 

ApJ, 283, 24 
van der Kruit, P. C. 1987, A&A, 173, 59 
Landolt, A. U. 1992, AJ, 104, 340 
Larson, R. B., & Tinsley, B. M. 1978, ApJ, 219, 46 
Marzke, R. O., Huchra, J. P., & Geller, M. J. 1994, ApJ, 428, 

43 
McGaugh, S. S., Schombert, J. M., & Bothun, G. D. 1995, 

MNRAS, 280, 337 
Nilson, P. 1973, Uppsala General Catalog of Galaxies, Uppsala 

Astron. Obs. Ann. 6. (UGC) 
Patterson R. J. & Thuan, T. X. 1996, ApJS, 107, 103 
Peletier, R. F., Davies, R. L., Illingworth, G. D., Davis, L. E., 

& Cawsori, M. 1990, AJ, 100, 1091 
Persson, S. E., Frogel, J. A., & Aaronson, M. 1979, ApJS, 39, 

61 
Rieke, G. H., & Lebofsky, M. J. 1985, ApJ, 288, 618 
Sandage, A. 1972, ApJ, 176, 21 
Sandage, A., & Binggeli, B. 1984, AJ, 89, 919 
Sandage, A. R., & Visvanathan N. 1978, ApJ, 223, 707 
Sprayberry, D., Impey, C. D., Bothun, G. D., & Irwin, M. J. 

1995, AJ, 109, 558 
Swaters, R. A. 1998, private communication 
Swaters, R. A., & Balcells, M. 1999, in preparation (SB99) 
Tinsley, B. M. 1980, Fund. Cosmic Phys., 5, 287 
TuUy, R. B., Verheijen, M. A. W., Pierce, M. J., Huang, J.-S., 

and Wainscoat, R. 1996, AJ, 112, 2471 
Yahil, A., Tammann, G. A., & Sandage, A. 1977, ApJ, 217, 

903 
Zwicky, F., Herzog, E., Wild, P., Karpowicz, M., & Kowal, C. 

1961-1968, Gatalog of Galaxies and of Clusters of Galaxies, 6 

vols., California Institute of Technology, Pasadena (CGCG) 



APPENDIX 



A. DISCUSSION OF INDIVIDUAL OBJECTS 

006 A00510+1225 Compact So galaxy with Seyfert i nucleus. This galaxy was classified as compact elliptical in CfA I. 

007 NGC 315 Aka. Holmberg 29A. 

009 (A01047+1625) This galaxy is not part of our statistical sample. It was observed because its estimated absolute 
magnitude was ^ —13, making it a nice addition to our faintest bin in absolute magnitude. Recent observations by Hopp 
(1999), however, suggest a much larger distance, and therefore higher luminosity (Ms ^ —14.5), than adopted in this 
paper. 

010 NGC 382 Close companion of NGC 383 in this group of galaxies. 
Oil IC 1639 Aka. Markarian 562. 

012 A01123— 0046 Compact Sc galaxy previously classified as compact elliptical in CfA I. This galaxy is interacting 

with two close companions. 

018 A01374+1539B This is the lowest surface brightness galaxy in our sample with a central surface brightness, 

/i^(0) ~ 24.5 mag arcsec^^, and is also known as DDO 13. 

027 NGC 927 Aka. Markarian 593. 

031 A02464+1807 is a compact galaxy dominated by a foreground star right on its center. We succeeded neither in 
obtaining surface photometry of the underlying galaxy, nor spectroscopy for this galaxy. In the atlas we only show the 
image. 

032 A02493-0122 is another LSB galaxy. Also known as DDO 30. 

041 NGC 2799 VV 50, Arp 283; interacting pair with NGC 2798. 

042 NGC 2824 Aka. Markarian 394. The light of a very bright star ~3' away from the galaxy needed to be modelled 
out prior to the ellipse fitting step. 



52 SURFACE PHOTOMETRY OF NEARBY FIELD GALAXIES 

044 NGC 3011 Aka. Markarian 409. 

047 A09557+4758 Through the irregular spiral disk of this galaxy, a more distant edge-on Sb is seen, giving the 

appearance of a break (PA=42°) in one of the arms of A09557-I-4758. 

050 NGC 3104 This LSB without a distinct nucleus is also known as VV 119. 

052 NGC 3165 The central parts of this galaxy are distinctly asymmetric. Possible companion to the Northeast. 

058 NGC 3279 Aka. IC 622. 

059 A10321+4649 Aka. Markarian 146. Disturbed morphology with a dust lane. 

062 A10365+4812 Galaxy showing the signature of a strongly warped disk. 

063 A10368+4811 The light distribution in this galaxy is asymmetric. 

064 NGC 3326 Aka. AKN 251. Very faint extended spiral structure is visible in this galaxy. 

065 A10389+3859 Three smaller disk systems appear to accompany this galaxy. 

066 A10431+3514 An edge-on early-type disk galaxy is seen through this Sa galaxy, 14" Northeast of the nucleus. 
072 NGC 3499 A dustlane is running over this SO/a galaxy. 

074 A11017-I-3828W This is the nearest galaxy with a BL Lac type nucleus. It is highly variable (observed changes 
of '-~^0.02 mag per night during its high state in May 1996). The photometry presented in this paper is an average of 
observations from March 1995, and March and May 1996. Due to the brightness of this object (forcing us to use very short 
exposures) and due to the presence of two bright stars nearby (leading to inaccurate measurement of the sky background, 
even after modelling out the stellar light), our photometry of the host galaxy is not deep. 
077 IC 673 Named IC 678 in CfA I. Galaxy with a low surface brightness disk and a normal surface brightness bulge. 

079 A11072+1302 Contains multiple bright knots; peculiar galaxy, a likely merger. 

080 NGC 3605 Light of the larger companion galaxy NGC 3607 needed to be modelled out prior to the ellipse fitting 
step. 

088 A11336+5829 The positional angle listed in the UGC has an incorrect sign and should be -9°(or 171°) rather than 
9°. 

089 NGC 3795A Named A1136+5833 in CfA I. 

092 A11378+2840 Bright knots in the inner parts of an otherwise smooth galaxy. 

093 A11392+1615 Aka. AKN 311 and Holmberg 275. May form a pair with a galaxy 2.3' to the West. 

094 NGC 3846 Highly asymmetric light distribution. Outer parts look tidally disturbed. 

097 NGC 3913 Aka. IC 740. The faint spiral structure appears to wind both clock- and counterclockwise. 
105 A12001+6439 Aka. Markarian 195. 
116 NGC 4288 Aka. DDO 119. 

119 A12195+7535 Seyfert i galaxy Markarian 205, classified as compact elliptical, seen through the spiral disk of 
foreground galaxy NGC 4319. 

120 A12263+4331 Aka. D 129. 

130 NGC 4841B Fainter of the two galaxies, to the northeast of brighter galaxy NGC 4841A. These two galaxies have 
a large overlap on the sky, resulting in shallow photometry. 

151 NGC 5491 An apparent smaller companion is located 25" North of the nucleus. 

152 NGC 5532 A smaller companion galaxy, 0.5' South of the center of this elliptical, is overlapping the outer parts. 

153 NGC 5541 Aka. AKN 444. 

154 NGC 5596 Aka. Markarian 470. 

158 NGC 5762 This galaxy harbors a very extended and low surface brightness fiocculent disk. 

159 A14489+3547 This galaxy shows a highly warped, banana-shaped disk and forms a pair with A14492-f 3545. Also 
known as II Zw 70 and VV 324. 

160 A14492+3545 Forms a pair with A14489+3547 (see remark above) and shows the morphological signature of a 
polar ring. Also known as II Zw 71 and VV 324. 

161 IC 1066 A large barred spiral galaxy is located 2.1' North of this galaxy. 
163 A15016+1037 Seyfert i nucleus. Also known as Markarian 841. 

166 NGC 5875A Named A1507+5229 in CfA I. 

169 NGC 5940 Galaxy with a weak Seyfert i nucleus; also known as Markarian 9030. 

171 NGC 5993 Two stars are superposed on this galaxy on either side of the nucleus. This galaxy as well as its neighbour 

2.4' to the SW (not in this sample) show hints of tidal features and are probably in interaction. 

173 IC 1144 Aka. Markarian 491. 

175 A15523+1645 Aka. AKN 489. 

181 NGC 7077 Aka. AKN 549. 

183 A22306+0750 Also known as II Zwl81 and AKN 558. 

193 NGC 7620 Aka. Markarian 321. 

194 A23264+1703 Harbors a double nucleus and shows tidal features of an ongoing interaction with a smaller companion. 

196 NGC 7752 Strongly interacting companion of NGC 7753 with one of the tidally disrupted arms of NGC 7753 causing 
a starburst on one side of NGC 7752. Also known as AKN 585, IV Zwl65 and VV 5. 

197 A23514+2813 Named NGC 7777 in CfA I. 

— (NGC 4319) Foreground spiral galaxy through which A12195+7535 is seen. 



JANSEN ET^L. 53 

B. CALIBRATION OF THE INTENSITY PROFILES 

We photometrically calibrated the radial intensity profiles by solving simultaneously for the calibration equations for 
B and R, or U and R, using {B — R) and (U — R) color terms, respectively. Consider the pair of calibration equations for 
the B and R intensity profiles: 

UBir) = ^lB,l{'^) +pzi-pei- Xi-pci- [pB - tJ'R){r) ,-q^. 

fJ.B.ir) = HR,i{r) +pz2 ~ pe2 ■ X2 - pc2 ■ [p^B - y'R){r) ' ^ ' 

where ^A,i denotes the surface brightnesses in B and R in instrumental mag arcsec"^, pz„ denote the photometric zero- 
points, pCn the specific atmospheric extinction coefficients and X„ the airmass at the middle of the exposures, and pc„ 
denote the color term coefficients corresponding to our choice of reference filters 



If we denote by Pnir) the terms that are independent of color, iJ,\,i{r) +pzn — pen ■ Xn, we can rewrite equations (Bl) 



as 



(1 +pci) •^B(r) = Pi{r) + pci ■ ^j,R{r) 
(1 - PC2) ■ fJ.R{r) = P2{r) - PC2 ■ ^J.B{r) 



(B2) 



from which wc find after substitution of each of these equations into each other: 

. ^ (1 - PC2) ■Pi+pci-P2 (1 +pci) ■ P2 - PC2 ■ Pi , . 

liB{r) = — and /Ufl;(r) = — . (B3) 

l+pCi - pC2 l+pCi - pC2 

Equations (B2) represent the solutions for the surface brightness profiles, corrected for the color term, in each of the two 
filters. Similar equations hold for U and R and corresponding color (U — R). This procedure avoids the introduction of 
additional correlated errors in the radial surface brightness profiles due to the two filters used in the color term correction, 
that one expects when propagating errors in the more commonly applied iterative methods. 

For completeness we give also the equations used to find the formal random errors on the surface brightness profiles 
thus derived: 

nm = 1 + pci — pc2 






(B4) 

2 ) • "pci 



Ph ■ o. 



The third and fourth terms under the root-sign are the dominant ones. We assume here that the individual errors, a^ are 
Gaussian in nature, and un-correlated. This approximately holds at the level of accuracy we are aiming for in this work. 

For the non-photometric profiles that were scaled to photometric intensity levels, we use the calibration constants, 
airmass and pixel scale of the photometric reference profile. The error on the fitted scale factor is included in quadrature 
in the error propagation. 

All unique i3,i?-filter pairs of intensity profiles were calibrated as described above, after which multiple resulting surface 
brightness profiles were combined into a single profile per filter. In the V calibrati on w e paired all V filter intensity profiles 



with a corresponding R profile, but only solved for the [/ filter part of equations (B3), not the R filter one, as the B filter 



profiles had better S/N in general and were therefore better suited for this purpose. 



54 



SURFACE PHOTOMETRY OF NEARBY FIELD GALAXIES 



Table 3 
Photometric measurements and parameters. 



ID 


Name 


UGC 


Dist 


Btat 


M|,°* 


-a 


S26 


^B 


Mf 


[U-B)^ 


(B-R)^ 


A(!7-S)t 


A(S-fl)t 






# 


Mpc 


(mag) 


(mag) 


(") 


(mag) 


(") 


(mag/D^) 


(mag) 


(mag) 


(mag) 


(mag) 


(1) 


(2) 


(3) 


(4) 


(5) 


(6) 


(7) 


(8) 


(9) 


(10) 


(11) 


(12) 


(13) 


(14) 


1 


A00113p3037 


130 


48.6 


14.66±0.02 


-18.77±0.09 


32.19± 4.29 


14.76±0.03 


6.26±0.04 


21.68±0.03 


0.53±0.02 


1.52±0.02 


-0.05±0.03 


-0.17±0.03 


2 


A00289p0556 


313 


20.9 


14.48±0.01 


-17.12±0.20 


31.44± 1.91 


14.52±0.01 


9.17±0.04 


21.79±0.02 


-0.16±0.01 


0.88±0.01 


0.16±0.03 


0.05±0.02 


3 


NGC193 


408 


43.2 


12.93±0.03 


-20.25±0.10 


89.42±14.28 


13.08±0.05 


27.92±0.38 


23.41±0.08 


0.56±0.04 


1.53±0.03 


-0.11±0.07 


-0.16±0.06 


4 


A00389m0159 


439 


52.4 


13.79±0.01 


-19.81±0.08 


46.21± 2.94 


13.86±0.01 


11.71±0.05 


22.08±0.02 


O.OOiO.Ol 


1.06±0.01 


-0.15±0.03 


-0.16±0.02 


5 


A00442p3224 


484 


49.7 


13.89±0.02 


-19.59±0.09 


50.98± 3.99 


13.96±0.02 


17.16±0.20 


22.80±0.06 


0.25±0.03 


1.35±0.03 


-0.30±0.05 


-0.39±0.05 


6 


A00510pl225 


545 


182.8 


14.30±0.01 


-22.01±0.03 


20.88± 1.84 


14.32±0.01 


1.19±0.01 


17.40±0.01 


-0.22±0.12 


0.73±0.02 


-0.51±0.26 


-0.11±0.04 


7 


NGC315 


597 


50.5 


12.04±0.04 


-21.48±0.09 


112.14±17.37 


12.13±0.04 


29.52±0.43 


22.50±0.09 


0.57±0.04 


1.55±0.04 


-0.16±0.08 


-0.08±0.07 


8 


A00570pl504 


615 


55.3 


14.70±0.02 


-19.01±0.08 


26.60± 1.80 


14.75±0.01 


7.48±0.09 


22.18±0.04 


0.43±0.02 


1.53±0.02 


-0.31±0.03 


-0.30±0.03 


9 


(A01047pl625 


685 


3.0 


14.09±0.02 


-13.33±1.10 


53.31± 4.42 


14.23±0.03 


20.31±0.14 


23.24±0.04 


-0.16±0.03 


0.79±0.03 


0.28±0.06 


0.16±0.04 


10 


NGC382 


688 


53.2 


14.56±0.06 


-19.07±0.10 


27.99± 1.98 


14.63±0.03 


6.58±0.09 


21.73±0.06 


0.64±0.06 


1.57±0.06 


0.04±0.11 


-O.lOiO.lO 


11 


IC1639 


750 


53.2 


14.38±0.01 


-19.25±0.08 


26.28± 2.47 


14.42±0.01 


4.23±0.05 


20.54±0.02 


0.36±0.01 


1.31±0.01 


0.02±0.02 


-0.12±0.02 


12 


A01123m0046 


793 


102.8 


14.81±0.01 


-20.25±0.04 


23.33± 1.62 


14.84±0.01 


7.59±0.02 


21.66±0.02 


-0.05±0.01 


1.18±0.01 


-0.05±0.02 


-0.21±0.02 


13 


A01187m0048 


892 


51.6 


13.68±0.02 


-19.88±0.08 


63.10± 5.32 


13.78±0.02 


23.16±0.22 


23.31±0.06 


0.37±0.03 


1.38±0.02 


-0.23±0.05 


-0.29±0.04 


14 


NGC516 


946 


24.4 


14.34±0.02 


-17.60±0.17 


39.02± 4.63 


14.42±0.02 


9.99±0.07 


22.15±0.02 


0.39±0.02 


1.46±0.02 


-0.03±0.04 


-0.05±0.04 


15 


A01300pl804 


1104 


8.0 


14.33±0.01 


-15.19±0.48 


37.25± 3.01 


14.41±0.01 


10.73±0.04 


22.21±0.02 


-0.27±0.02 


0.70±0.01 


0.16±0.03 


0.19±0.03 


16 


A01344p2838 


1154 


78.0 


14.64±0.02 


-19.82±0.06 


26.44± 1.52 


14.67±0.01 


7.72±0.06 


21.80±0.03 


-0.05±0.02 


1.03±0.02 


-0.24±0.04 


-0.22±0.04 


17 


A01346p0438 


1155 


31.3 


14.79±0.01 


-17.69±0.13 


23.36± 1.83 


14.83±0.01 


5.33±0.02 


21.10±0.02 


-0.15±0.01 


0.94±0.01 


-0.03±0.02 


-0.11±0.02 


18 


A01374pl539 


1176 


7.3 


14.09±0.09 


-15.23±0.53 


74.31±12.74 


14.53±0.14 


55.23±3.14 


25.37±0.32 




0.52±0.11 




0.29±0.19 


19 


NGC695 


1315 


98.5 


13.97±0.03 


-21.00±0.05 


30.34± 4.06 


14.07±0.01 


7.19±0.05 


20.91±0.02 


-0.07±0.03 


1.22±0.03 


-0.03±0.05 


-0.15±0.05 


20 


(NGC784) 


1501 


3.6 


12.23±0.05 


-15.56±0.96 


113.27±13.46 


12.33±0.05 


42.93±0.76 


23.03±0.10 


-0.26±0.05 


0.71±0.05 


0.15±0.08 


0.06±0.09 


21 


A02008p2350 


1551 


27.3 


13.55±0.04 


-18.63±0.16 


72.67± 8.03 


13.63±0.03 


31.94±0.35 


23.53±0.06 


-0.07±0.05 


0.91±0.05 


-0.10±0.09 


-0.20±0.09 


22 


IC195 


1555 


36.5 


14.20±0.04 


-18.61±0.12 


36.86± 6.91 


14.34±0.03 


7.79±0.04 


21.83±0.02 


0.19±0.04 


1.52±0.04 


-0.26±0.07 


-0.09±0.07 


23 


IC197 


1564 


62.4 


14.49±0.01 


-19.49±0.07 


25.07± 1.54 


14.51±0.01 


9.12±0.04 


21.79±0.03 


0.07±0.01 


1.18±0.01 


-0.28±0.02 


-0.33±0.02 


24 


IC1776 


1579 


33.6 


14.08±0.02 


-18.55±0.13 


51.38± 3.29 


14.15±0.02 


21.70±0.19 


23.39±0.05 


-0.08±0.03 


0.88±0.02 


-0.07±0.05 


-0.15±0.04 


25 


A02056pl444 


1630 


43.9 


13.94±0.04 


-19.27±0.10 


42.79±11.69 


14.17±0.05 


11.72±0.10 


21.90±0.04 


-0.01±0.04 


1.11±0.04 


-0.00±0.06 


-0.14±0.06 


26 


NGC825 


1636 


33.6 


14.10±0.02 


-18.53±0.13 


44.90± 3.99 


14.21±0.02 


10.31±0.11 


22.50±0.03 


0.50±0.02 


1.61±0.02 


-0.25±0.05 


-0.20±0.04 


27 


NGC927 


1908 


81.9 


13.84±0.01 


-20.73±0.05 


44.29± 2.64 


13.87±0.01 


16.28±0.08 


22.45±0.03 


0.07±0.02 


1.24±0.01 


-0.11±0.03 


-0.27±0.03 


28 


A02257m0134 


1945 


17.1 


14.12±0.02 


-17.05±0.24 


49.32± 4.70 


14.23±0.02 


17.98±0.13 


22.95±0.04 


-0.11±0.02 


0.98±0.02 


0.11±0.04 


0.11±0.04 


29 


NGC984 


2059 


44.2 


13.62±0.04 


-19.61±0.10 


58.36± 9.81 


13.72±0.05 


18.47±0.34 


22.91±0.11 


0.58±0.05 


1.68±0.04 


-0.23±0.08 


-0.26±0.08 


30 


NGC1029 


2149 


36.0 


13.93±0.02 


-18.85±0.12 


34.21± 5.84 


13.99±0.02 


7.65±0.04 


21.15±0.03 


0.59±0.02 


1.63±0.02 


0.04±0.04 


-0.16±0.04 


31 


A02464pl807 


2296 


101.0 


13.26±0.04 


-21.76±0.06 


48.69± 8.68 


13.31±0.04 


2.37±0.28 


18.42±0.09 


0.91±0.05 


1.18±0.11 


0.09±0.11 


0.06±0.27 


32 


A02493m0122 


2345 


14.6 


14.27±0.05 


-16.55±0.28 


70.00± 5.23 


14.46±0.05 


40.68±0.85 


24.71±0.14 


0.12±0.07 


0.84±0.07 


-0.10±0.12 


-0.12±0.13 


33 


NGC1298 


2683 


63.9 


14.01±0.03 


-20.02±0.07 


45.83± 7.29 


14.09±0.04 


10.96±0.10 


22.28±0.05 


0.64±0.04 


1.53±0.03 


-0.02±0.08 


-0.05±0.06 


34 


A03202m0205 


2704 


80.7 


14.33±0.02 


-20.21±0.06 


38.08± 3.89 


14.42±0.02 


8.88±0.06 


21.81±0.02 


0.16±0.02 


1.48±0.02 


-0.17±0.03 


-0.22±0.04 


35 


NGC1552 


3015 


48.0 


13.47±0.06 


-19.93±0.11 


69.82±13.94 


13.63±0.06 


19.54±0.34 


23.16±0.08 


0.54±0.06 


1.68±0.06 


-0.04±0.10 


-0.19±0.10 


36 


NGC2692 


4675 


40.3 


14.04±0.03 


-18.99±0.11 


39.46± 7.56 


14.16±0.03 


10.56±0.08 


22.03±0.04 


0.50±0.03 


1.71±0.03 


-0.09±0.06 


-0.09±0.05 


37 


A08567p5242 


4713 


92.3 


13.90±0.03 


-20.93±0.06 


50.21± 3.16 


14.01±0.01 


17.75±0.18 


22.95±0.03 


0.26±0.04 


1.54±0.04 


-0.18±0.06 


-0.28±0.06 


38 


A09045p3328 


4787 


6.1 


14.44±0.02 


-14.48±0.62 


39.32± 2.42 


14.49±0.02 


15.71±0.13 


22.87±0.05 


-0.09±0.03 


0.86±0.02 


-0.00±0.04 


0.01±0.04 


39 


NGC2780 


4843 


22.0 


14.52±0.02 


-17.19±0.19 


31.77± 1.65 


14.57±0.01 


12.70±0.06 


22.31±0.03 


0.07±0.02 


1.32±0.02 


-0.11±0.04 


-0.15±0.04 


40 


A09125p5303 


4879 


8.2 


13.67±0.04 


-15.90±0.48 


72.10± 8.16 


13.83±0.04 


31.69±0.54 


23.92±0.09 


0.01±0.05 


1.16±0.04 


0.20±0.08 


0.28±0.07 


41 


NGC2799 


4909 


21.6 


14.26±0.06 


-17.42±0.20 


36.33± 1.96 


14.45±0.01 


12.32±0.11 


22.67±0.04 


-0.09±0.06 


1.07±0.06 


0.09±0.11 


-0.09±0.11 


42 


NGC2824 


4933 


29.5 


13.38±0.08 


-18.97±0.16 


78.16±23.99 


13.78±0.15 


35.34±1.52 


24.89±0.24 


0.49±0.08 


1.52±0.09 


0.85±0.14 


-0.04±0.16 


43 


NGC2844 


4971 


17.7 


13.77±0.02 


-17.47±0.23 


49.34± 3.94 


13.86±0.02 


12.63±0.07 


22.28±0.02 


0.20±0.02 


1.45±0.02 


-0.07±0.03 


-0.21±0.04 


44 


NGC3011 


5259 


18.0 


14.65±0.01 


-16.62±0.23 


27.89± 1.88 


14.69±0.01 


6.32±0.09 


21.46±0.04 


-0.16±0.02 


1.25±0.01 


-0.03±0.03 


-0.20±0.03 


45 


NGC3009 


5264 


49.0 


14.67±0.02 


-18.78±0.09 


30.40± 2.00 


14.70±0.01 


11.63±0.05 


22.32±0.03 


0.06±0.02 


1.11±0.02 


-0.10±0.04 


-0.16±0.03 


46 


IC2520 


5335 


14.8 


14.03±0.03 


-16.82±0.28 


32.74± 3.91 


14.17±().()1 


10.07±0.04 


21.74±0.02 


-0.20±0.03 


1.26±0.03 


-0.24±0.07 


-0.27±0.05 


47 


A09557p4758 


5354 


15.0 


13.69±0.05 


-17.19±0.28 


65.51±12.72 


13.89±0.07 


27.97±0.40 


23.61±0.08 


-0.23±0.05 


0.81±0.05 


-0.00±0.09 


-0.22±0.09 


48 


NGC3075 


5360 


37.1 


14.07±0.02 


-18.78±0.12 


46.42± 5.58 


14.17±0.03 


17.47±0.11 


22.88±0.04 


-0.02±0.02 


1.15±0.02 


-0.17±0.04 


-0.28±0.04 


49 


A09579p0439 


5378 


42.7 


14.73±0.02 


-18.42±0.10 


31.27± 1.63 


14.78±0.01 


9.22±0.06 


22.28±0.03 


0.09±0.02 


1.18±0.02 


-0.08±0.05 


-0.25±0.03 


50 


NGC3104 


5414 


7.1 


13.30±0.04 


-15.96±0.54 


81.74± 7.58 


13.41±0.04 


37.43±0.64 


23.95±0.10 


-0.27±0.04 


0.79±0.04 


0.01±0.07 


0.07±0.07 


51 


A10042p4716 


5451 


7.2 


14.13±0.02 


-15.17±0.53 


49.49± 3.51 


14.25±0.02 


17.76±0.15 


22.89±0.05 


-0.08±0.02 


1.18±0.02 


-0.00±0.04 


-0.03±().()4 


52 


NGC3165 


5512 


14.8 


14.57±0.02 


-16.28±0.28 


37.13± 2.61 


14.64±0.02 


14.71±0.14 


22.80±0.06 


-0.02±0.03 


1.11±0.02 


-0.06±0.05 


-0.02±0.04 


53 


A10114p0716 


5522 


14.0 


13.82±0.05 


-16.90±0.30 


72.14± 5.52 


13.99±0.03 


28.48±0.61 


24.40±0.10 


-0.24±0.05 


0.89±0.05 


-0.24±0.10 


-0.32±0.09 


54 


NGC3179 


5555 


74.7 


14.29±0.01 


-20.08±0.06 


32.47± 2.24 


14.36±0.01 


6.81±0.11 


21.57±0.05 


0.67±0.03 


1.56±0.02 


-0.05±0.06 


-0.09±0.03 


55 


A10171p3853 


5577 


23.3 


14.45±0.02 


-17.38±0.18 


34.39± 2.32 


14.50±0.02 


13.57±0.16 


22.64±0.05 


-0.17±0.02 


0.96±0.02 


-0.05±0.04 


-0.05±0.03 


56 


NGC3213 


5590 


16.8 


13.95±0.07 


-17.18±0.25 


40.20± 4.68 


14.17±0.02 


15.94±0.09 


22.43±0.03 


0.00±0.07 


1.21±0.07 


-0.16±0.12 


-0.12±0.12 


57 


NGC3264 


5719 


12.7 


13.65±0.03 


-16.87±0.32 


66.11± 4.52 


13.73±0.02 


27.32±0.24 


23.50±0.05 


-0.18±0.04 


0.77±0.03 


0.02±0.07 


-0.01±0.06 


58 


NGC3279 


5741 


16.8 


13.80±0.03 


-17.32±0.25 


42.47± 6.27 


13.87±0.02 


15.32±0.08 


22.18±0.03 


0.42±0.03 


1.52±0.03 


-0.08±0.06 


-0.19±0.05 


59 


A10321p4649 


5744 


36.4 


14.61±0.01 


-18.19±0.12 


26.02± 1.18 


14.63±0.01 


6.10±0.03 


21.25±0.02 


-0.16±0.01 


l.OOiO.Ol 


0.20±0.02 


O.lOiO.Ol 


60 


A10337pl358 


5760 


32.0 


14.41±0.01 


-18.11±0.13 


32.27± 2.34 


14.45±0.01 


11.29±0.04 


22.13±0.03 


0.11±().02 


1.33±0.01 


-0.06±0.03 


-0.12±0.02 


61 


IC2591 


5763 


69.6 


14.44±0.01 


-19.77±0.06 


34.20± 1.93 


14.48±0.01 


11.18±0.05 


22.54±0.03 


-O.lOiO.Ol 


1.08±0.01 


-0.14±0.02 


-0.40±0.02 


62 


A10365p4812 


5791 


11.4 


14.67±0.03 


-15.62±0.35 


36.70± 2.88 


14.85±0.02 


10.84±0.07 


22.94±0.03 


-0.23±0.03 


0.70±0.03 


0.03±0.05 


0.04±0.05 


63 


A10368p4811 


5798 


19.0 


14.70±0.03 


-16.70±0.22 


28.19± 4.46 


14.81±0.02 


8.47±0.04 


21.78±0.02 


-0.29±0.03 


0.69±0.03 


-0.07±0.06 


-0.07±0.05 


64 


NGC3326 


5799 


82.0 


14.50±0.03 


-20.07±0.06 


31.57± 5.15 


14.58±0.02 


6.82±0.06 


21.85±0.02 


0.11±0.03 


1.26±0.03 


-0.20±0.06 


-0.08±0.06 


65 


A10389p3859 


5819 


106.9 


14.70±0.05 


-20.44±0.06 


30.41± 2.46 


14.77±0.04 


11.05±0.16 


22.48±0.09 


0.44±().()5 


1.70±0.05 


-0.23±0.09 


-0.21±0.09 


66 


A10431p3514 


5870 


23.6 


14.37±0.02 


-17.50±0.18 


39.85± 2.31 


14.45±0.01 


9.11±0.05 


22.08±0.02 


0.25±0.02 


1.37±0.02 


-0.34±0.03 


-0.23±0.03 


67 


A10448p0731 


5892 


82.1 


14.54±0.12 


-20.03±0.13 


40.70± 7.07 


14.66±0.05 


14.64±0.30 


23.47±0.13 


0.22±0.12 


1.40±0.12 


-0.29±0.22 


-0.35±0.22 


68 


A10465p0711 


5923 


5.6 


14.53±0.03 


-14.21±0.66 


34.16± 4.52 


14.62±0.02 


9.68±0.09 


22.23±0.05 


0.11±0.03 


1.27±0.03 


0.19±0.05 


0.04±0.05 


69 


A10504p0454 


6003 


58.9 


14.59±0.01 


-19.26±0.07 


24.63± 1.36 


14.62±0.01 


3.97±0.10 


20.65±0.03 


-0.37±0.02 


0.75±0.02 


0.26±0.03 


0.11±0.04 


70 


NGC3454 


6026 


14.4 


14.14±0.01 


-16.65±0.28 


41.55± 2.69 


14.20±0.01 


14.27±0.07 


22.26±0.03 


0.08±0.()2 


1.21±0.02 


-0.04±0.04 


-0.08±0.03 


71 


A10592pl652 


6104 


31.7 


14.78±0.02 


-17.73±0.13 


30.01± 1.65 


14.82±0.02 


11.90±0.08 


22.70±0.04 


-0.07±0.02 


0.92±0.02 


-0.17±0.03 


-0.26±0.03 


72 


NGC3499 


6115 


19.5 


14.39±0.01 


-17.06±0.21 


28.79± 2.19 


14.42±0.01 


7.15±0.03 


21.57±0.02 


0.43±0.01 


1.60±0.01 


-0.16±0.03 


-0.24±0.03 


73 


NGC3510 


6126 


6.7 


13.45±0.02 


-15.68±0.57 


57.04± 2.47 


13.50±0.01 


19.87±0.11 


22.70±0.03 


-0.21±0.03 


0.84±0.02 


-0.04±0.04 


-0.05±0.03 


74 


A11017p3828 


6132 


91.0 


13.41±0.04 


-21.39±0.06 


17.63± 1.42 


13.43±0.02 


1.68±0.06 


17.20±0.09 


-0.71±0.07 


0.68±0.04 


0.18±0.11 


-0.04±0.08 


75 


NGC3522 


6159 


16.0 


13.88±0.02 


-17.14±0.26 


48.85± 5.73 


13.98±0.02 


11.27±0.08 


22.28±0.02 


0.35±0.02 


1.41±0.02 


-0.16±0.03 


-0.14±0.03 


76 


A11040p5130 


6162 


25.7 


13.52±0.03 


-18.53±0.17 


64.47± 4.61 


13.59±0.03 


30.36±0.32 


23.37±0.07 


-0.11±0.04 


0.90±0.04 


-0.20±0.07 


-0.18±0.06 


77 


IC673 


6200 


39.8 


14.26±0.08 


-18.74±0.14 


51.93± 7.69 


14.45±0.05 


17.09±0.18 


23.71±0.06 


0.09±0.08 


1.26±0.08 


-0.06±0.15 


-0.38±0.14 


78 


A11068p4705 


6201 


77.5 


14.62±0.03 


-19.83±0.06 


31.60± 2.58 


14.74±0.01 


6.85±0.04 


21.97±0.03 


0.44±0.03 


1.59±0.03 


-0.17±0.05 


-0.20±0.05 


79 


A11072pl302 


6206 


126.2 


14.84±0.02 


-20.67±0.04 


22.97± 1.37 


14.89±0.01 


6.28±0.11 


21.56±0.02 


-0.14±0.02 


0.84±0.02 


0.07±0.04 


-0.13±0.04 


80 


NGC3605 


6295 


5.5 


13.29±0.03 


-15.42±0.67 


67.50±13.10 


13.48±0.05 


14.58±0.09 


22.40±0.03 


0.42±0.03 


1.41±0.03 


0.07±0.05 


-0.10±0.05 



JANSENET^L. 



55 















Table 3 — Continued 












ID 


Name 


UGC 


Dist 


Btat 


^tot 


rie 


S26 


'■f 


Mf 


(C-S)e 


(B-B.)^ 


A(i7-B)t 


A(S-fi)t 






# 


Mpc 


(mag) 


(mag) 


(") 


(mag) 


(") 


(mag/D^) 


(mag) 


(mag) 


(mag) 


(mag) 


(1) 


(2) 


(3) 


(4) 


(5) 


(6) 


(7) 


(8) 


(9) 


(10) 


(11) 


(12) 


(13) 


(14) 


81 


A11142pl804 


6296 


9.1 


14.46±0.02 


-15.32±0.43 


36.07± 2.54 


14.53±0.01 


13.49±0.07 


22.55±0.03 


0.19±0.02 


1.40±0.02 


-0.07±0.04 


-0.12±0.03 


82 


NGC3633 


6351 


27.7 


14.01±0.18 


-18.20±0.24 


30.31± 5.30 


14.46±0.02 


13.31±0.12 


22.66±0.05 


0.28±0.18 


1.51±0.18 


-0.02±0.31 


-0.44±0.31 


83 


IC692 


6438 


15.0 


14.60±0.01 


-16.28±0.27 


26.03± 2.28 


14.64±0.01 


5.22±0.02 


21.11±0.02 


-0.19±0.01 


0.76±0.01 


0.10±0.03 


0.18±0.02 


84 


A11238p5401 


6446 


9.0 


13.35±0.11 


-16.43±0.45 


91.32±14.01 


13.64±0.08 


51.47±1.60 


24.74±0.18 


-0.18±0.11 


0.80±0.11 


-0.07±0.20 


-0.21±0.20 


85 


A11310p3254 


6545 


29.5 


14.37±0.02 


-17.98±0.14 


33.60± 3.82 


14.42±0.02 


10.87±0.04 


21.89±0.02 


0.21±0.02 


1.36±0.02 


-0.13±0.04 


-0.23±0.04 


86 


IC708 


6549 


95.0 


14.21±0.02 


-20.68±0.05 


50.50± 5.66 


14.39±0.04 


15.94±0.13 


23.55±0.04 


0.52±0.03 


1.64±0.02 


-0.05±0.05 


-0.08±0.04 


87 


A11332p3536 


6570 


20.0 


14.33±0.01 


-17.17±0.21 


34.14± 3.17 


14.40±0.01 


6.73±0.04 


21.57±0.03 


0.08±0.02 


1.20±0.01 


0.14±0.03 


0.03±0.03 


88 


A11336p5829 


6575 


16.3 


14.33±0.03 


-16.73±0.25 


37.16± 3.94 


14.39±0.02 


13.64±0.10 


22.51±0.04 


-0.19±0.03 


0.92±0.03 


-0.09±0.05 


-0.17±0.05 


89 


NGC3795A 


6616 


15.6 


13.65±0.03 


-17.31±0.26 


74.49± 4.03 


13.74±0.02 


33.86±0.41 


23.94±0.07 


-0.00±0.03 


0.92±0.03 


-0.10±0.06 


-0.17±0.05 


90 


A11372p2012 


6625 


108.9 


14.30±0.02 


-20.89±0.04 


27.39± 1.04 


14.34±0.01 


8.64±0.03 


21.51±0.02 


-0.05±0.02 


1.02±0.02 


-0.23±0.03 


-0.35±0.03 


91 


NGC3795 


6629 


14.9 


14.10±0.02 


-16.77±0.27 


39.93± 3.64 


14.15±0.02 


13.09±0.08 


22.27±0.04 


0.08±0.02 


1.19±0.02 


-0.15±0.04 


-0.19±0.04 


92 


A11378p2840 


6637 


22.0 


14.84±0.01 


-16.88±0.19 


23.16± 1.40 


14.90±0.01 


5.07±0.02 


20.95±0.01 


-0.16±0.01 


0.91±0.01 


-0.03±0.03 


0.03±0.02 


93 


A11392pl615 


6655 


6.2 


14.85±0.02 


-14.11±0.61 


27.04± 2.81 


14.90±0.01 


5.89±0.04 


21.51±0.03 


-0.26±0.02 


0.83±0.02 


0.25±0.05 


-0.00±0.03 


94 


NGC3846 


6706 


18.1 


13.78±0.03 


-17.51±0.23 


61.12± 3.52 


13.86±0.02 


21.40±0.24 


23.30±0.06 


-0.09±0.03 


0.83±0.03 


-0.10±0.06 


-0.07±0.05 


95 


NGC3850 


6733 


15.7 


13.94±0.02 


-17.04±0.26 


59.07± 3.30 


14.04±0.02 


24.48±0.21 


23.45±0.05 


-0.06±0.03 


0.94±0.02 


-0.09±0.05 


-0.11±0.04 


96 


A11476p4220 


6805 


14.2 


14.85±0.01 


-15.91±0.29 


22.60± 2.48 


14.90±0.01 


4.75±0.03 


21.01±0.01 


-0.16±0.01 


0.99±0.01 


0.35±0.02 


0.11±0.02 


97 


NGC3913 


6813 


13.4 


13.23±0.08 


-17.40±0.31 


87.59±14.18 


13.44±0.07 


39.33±0.92 


24.29±0.15 


-0.10±0.08 


1.00±0.08 


-0.11±0.14 


-0.20±0.14 


98 


IC746 


6898 


52.7 


14.73±0.02 


-18.88±0.08 


28.87± 3.26 


14.79±0.02 


8.02±0.03 


21.89±0.02 


-0.04±0.02 


0.92±0.02 


-0.14±0.04 


-0.10±0.03 


99 


A11531p0132 


6903 


21.9 


13.53±0.06 


-18.17±0.20 


72.80± 5.03 


13.60±0.02 


37.09±0.30 


23.68±0.05 


-0.03±0.06 


1.06±0.06 


-0.16±0.10 


-0.25±0.10 


100 


NGC3978 


6910 


101.0 


13.51±0.02 


-21.51±0.05 


52.57± 5.19 


13.56±0.02 


15.95±0.11 


22.14±0.03 


-0.01±0.02 


1.20±0.02 


-0.01±0.03 


-0.19±O.O3 


101 


A11547p4933 


6930 


10.8 


12.71±0.08 


-17.45±0.38 


106.62±16.90 


12.88±0.08 


47.41±1.81 


23.63±0.23 


-0.08±0.09 


0.96±0.09 


-0.15±0.16 


-0.19±0.15 


102 


A11547p5813 


6931 


15.9 


14.66±0.02 


-16.34±0.26 


39.02± 2.12 


14.73±0.02 


17.13±0.11 


23.14±0.04 


-0.25±0.03 


0.72±0.03 


-0.21±0.05 


-0.12±0.04 


103 


NGC4034 


7006 


27.8 


14.44±0.04 


-17.78±0.16 


48.68± 2.42 


14.50±0.02 


21.41±0.22 


23.63±0.06 


0.05±0.04 


1.13±0.04 


-0.10±0.07 


-0.23±0.06 


104 


A11592p6237 


7009 


15.3 


14.56±0.02 


-16.37±0.27 


33.63± 1.61 


14.61±0.02 


13.65±0.11 


22.88±0.05 


-0.28±0.02 


0.77±0.02 


0.05±0.04 


-0.04±0.04 


105 


A12a01p6439 


7020A 


18.7 


14.45±0.02 


-16.91±0.22 


29.76± 3.22 


14.49±0.01 


5.96±0.04 


21.40±0.03 


-0.16±0.02 


1.22±0.02 


0.38±0.04 


0.10±0.03 


106 


NGC4117 


7112 


13.3 


14.01±0.01 


-16.61±0.30 


41.87± 4.07 


14.07±0.02 


10.08±0.04 


21.92±0.02 


0.30±0.02 


1.51±0.01 


-0.09±0.03 


-0.17±0.03 


107 


NGC4120 


7121 


26.5 


14.22±0.03 


-17.90±0.16 


39.96± 4.48 


14.29±0.02 


14.35±0.10 


22.51±0.04 


-0.19±0.03 


0.98±0.03 


-0.03±0.05 


-0.08±0.05 


108 


A12064p4201 


7129 


12.8 


14.21±0.02 


-16.33±0.31 


44.48± 3.13 


14.30±0.02 


13.25±0.08 


22.57±0.03 


0.03±0.02 


1.25±0.02 


0.29±0.03 


0.12±0.03 


109 


NGC4141 


7147 


23.9 


13.53±0.05 


-18.36±0.18 


46.84± 3.83 


13.60±0.04 


14.62±0.28 


22.05±0.12 


0.64±0.05 


1.16±0.05 


-0.24±0.08 


-0.36±0.09 


110 


NGC4159 


7174 


21.7 


14.26±0.01 


-17.42±0.19 


36.88± 3.61 


14.33±0.02 


11.62±0.07 


22.19±0.03 


-0.16±0.02 


0.99±0.02 


-0.02±0.03 


-0.06±0.03 


111 


NGC4204 


7261 


7.1 


12.87±0.07 


-16.38±0.55 


112.40±20.32 


13.15±0.10 


61.49±3.01 


24.63±0.30 


-0.18±0.09 


0.86±0.08 


-0.01±0.15 


-0.18±0.14 


112 


NGC4238 


7308 


31.6 


14.25±0.01 


-18.25±0.13 


35.04± 1.41 


14.29±0.01 


13.46±0.05 


22.33±0.02 


-0.19±0.02 


0.87±0.02 


-0.05±0.03 


-0.09±0.03 


113 


NGC4248 


7335 


6.0 


13.30±0.02 


-15.59±0.62 


70.36± 6.07 


13.38±0.02 


25.93±0.30 


23.06±0.06 


0.10±0.03 


1.36±0.02 


0.15±0.05 


0.10±0.04 


114 


A12167p4938 


7358 


39.9 


14.34±0.01 


-18.67±0.11 


33.16± 1.60 


14.37±0.02 


14.29±0.09 


22.45±0.04 


0.19±0.02 


1.18±0.02 


-0.20±0.04 


-0.27±0.03 


115 


NGC4272 


7378 


86.9 


14.20±0.03 


-20.50±0.06 


50.57± 5.77 


14.35±0.04 


14.79±0.28 


23.24±0.10 


0.52±0.04 


1.63±0.03 


-0.11±0.07 


-0.08±0.06 


116 


NGC4288 


7399 


6.5 


13.39±0.02 


-15.68±0.58 


65.57± 5.75 


13.47±0.02 


25.01±0.22 


22.94±0.05 


-0.23±0.03 


0.80±0.03 


-0.11±0.05 


-0.11±0.05 


117 


NGC4308 


7426 


5.9 


14.41±0.01 


-14.44±0.63 


31.11± 2.24 


14.48±0.01 


7.83±0.04 


21.81±0.02 


0.32±0.02 


1.39±0.01 


-0.11±0.03 


-0.14±0.03 


118 


A12195p3222 


7428 


16.5 


14.01±0.04 


-17.07±0.25 


53.46± 7.64 


14.22±0.04 


24.04±0.40 


23.68±0.10 


-0.01±0.04 


0.79±0.04 


0.02±0.08 


-0.10±0.08 


119 


A12195p7535 




214.2 


15.49±0.04 


-21.16±0.04 


11.07± 0.66 


15.51±0.03 


1.77±0.06 


19.39±0.08 


-1.01±0.05 


0.73±0.07 


0.02±0.10 


0.09±0.16 


120 


A12263p4331 


7608 


6.2 


13.85±0.08 


-15.12±0.61 


77.70±14.63 


14.28±0.13 


55.27±2.61 


25.23±0.30 


-0.22±0.09 


0.70±0.10 


-0.02±0.17 


-0.15±0.17 


121 


A12295p4a07 


7678 


7.8 


14.15±0.02 


-15.32±0.49 


41.48± 2.61 


14.24±0.01 


12.55±0.10 


22.30±0.04 


-0.33±0.02 


0.62±0.02 


0.11±0.03 


0.18±0.03 


122 


A12300p4259 


7690 


6.2 


13.37±0.01 


-15.61±0.60 


63.72± 2.17 


13.41±0.01 


21.50±0.12 


22.71±0.03 


-0.22±0.02 


0.82±0.01 


-0.15±0.03 


-0.10±0.03 


123 


A12304p3754 


7699 


5.3 


13.25±0.01 


-15.35±0.70 


67.48± 2.67 


13.30±0.01 


27.08±0.14 


22.90±0.03 


-0.19±0.02 


0.81±0.01 


-0.10±0.03 


-0.16±0.02 


124 


NGC4509 


7704 


12.0 


14.39±0.02 


-16.01±0.33 


30.29± 2.48 


14.44±0.01 


8.13±0.05 


21.50±0.04 


-0.47±0.02 


0.52±0.02 


0.07±0.04 


0.05±0.03 


125 


A12331p723a 


7761 


72.8 


14.64±0.02 


-19.67±0.06 


26.86± 2.34 


14.67±0.01 


9.86±0.05 


22.19±0.04 


-0.01±0.02 


1.10±0.02 


-0.05±0.04 


-0.14±0.04 


126 


A12446p5155 


7950 


6.9 


13.44±0.07 


-15.77±0.55 


72.73±13.51 


13.60±0.07 


25.60±0.81 


23.68±0.20 


-0.21±0.08 


0.66±0.08 


0.28±0.13 


0.01±0.14 


127 


NGC4758 


8014 


17.3 


13.56±0.04 


-17.64±0.24 


61.41± 5.39 


13.62±0.03 


24.56±0.25 


23.09±0.06 


0.11±0.04 


1.12±0.04 


-0.03±0.07 


-0.11±0.07 


128 


NGC4795 


8037 


31.0 


13.00±0.01 


-19.46±0.14 


70.66± 3.90 


13.06±0.01 


21.21±0.15 


22.73±0.03 


0.44±0.02 


1.49±0.01 


-0.10±0.03 


-0.13±0.03 


129 


NGC4807 


8049 


72.0 


14.58±0.02 


-19.71±0.06 


34.43± 2.57 


14.66±0.01 


7.12±0.05 


22.04±0.02 


0.49±0.02 


1.57±0.02 


-0.11±0.03 


-0.14±0.03 


130 


NGC4841B 


8073 


65.4 


14.69±0.03 


-19.39±0.07 


29.81± 1.66 


14.76±0.02 


8.03±0.09 


22.22±0.06 


0.56±0.03 


1.54±0.03 


-0.12±0.06 


-0.15±0.06 


131 


NGC4926 


8142 


80.1 


14.05±0.02 


-20.47±0.06 


46.53± 4.86 


14.20±0.03 


12.46±0.09 


22.77±0.03 


0.57±0.02 


1.60±0.02 


-0.14±0.04 


-0.10±0.04 


132 


NGC4961 


8185 


29.1 


13.75±0.02 


-18.57±0.15 


45.66± 3.70 


13.81±0.01 


14.19±0.14 


22.50±0.05 


-0.08±0.03 


0.93±0.02 


-0.19±0.05 


-0.21±0.04 


133 


A13065p5420 


8231 


28.7 


14.55±0.02 


-17.74±0.15 


32.95± 2.10 


14.59±0.02 


13.03±0.08 


22.62±0.04 


-0.22±0.02 


0.77±0.02 


-0.16±0.03 


-0.19±0.03 


134 


IC4213 


8280 


10.4 


14.06±0.01 


-16.03±0.38 


42.34± 2.14 


14.12±0.01 


15.37±0.10 


22.52±0.03 


-0.12±0.02 


0.94±0.01 


0.01±0.03 


-0.09±0.02 


135 


A13194p4232 


8400 


37.7 


14.57±0.02 


-18.31±0.11 


28.56± 1.39 


14.60±0.01 


10.41±0.04 


22.05±0.02 


-0.08±0.02 


1.10±0.03 


-().10±().()4 


-0.17±0.06 


136 


NGC5117 


8411 


28.0 


14.29±0.04 


-17.95±0.15 


45.91± 2.45 


14.34±0.03 


18.50±0.35 


23.37±0.10 


0.29±0.04 


0.99±0.04 


-0.12±0.07 


-0.15±0.07 


137 


NGC5173 


8468 


28.8 


13.72±0.02 


-18.58±0.15 


48.98± 5.70 


13.80±0.02 


9.39±0.06 


21.75±0.02 


0.29±0.02 


1.38±0.02 


-0.17±0.04 


-0.14±0.03 


138 


A13281p3153 


8498 


76.1 


13.98±0.03 


-20.43±0.06 


50.21± 3.99 


14.10±0.02 


14.89±0.12 


22.88±0.03 


0.36±0.04 


1.53±0.04 


-0.27±0.07 


-0.38±0.06 


139 


NGC5208 


8519 


69.7 


14.02±0.02 


-20.19±0.06 


45.08± 2.77 


14.14±0.01 


11.03±0.06 


22.27±0.02 


0.56±0.02 


1.70±0.02 


-0.11±0.04 


-0.12±0.03 


140 


NGC5230 


8573 


70.9 


13.19±0.02 


-21.06±0.06 


62.74± 2.21 


13.23±0.01 


26.05±0.10 


22.58±0.03 


0.09±0.02 


1.13±0.02 


-0.20±0.04 


-0.34±0.03 


141 


A13361p3323 


8630 


27.8 


14.40±0.02 


-17.82±0.15 


35.20± 1.80 


14.46±0.02 


14.88±0.12 


22.45±0.06 


-0.46±0.03 


0.83±0.02 


0.55±0.04 


-0.16±0.04 


142 


NGC5267 


8655 


62.6 


14.10±0.02 


-19.88±0.07 


36.36± 3.41 


14.15±0.01 


12.98±0.06 


22.16±0.03 


0.45±0.02 


1.56±0.02 


-0.28±0.03 


-0.26±0.03 


143 


A13422p3526 


8693 


29.1 


14.65±0.02 


-17.67±0.15 


32.94± 1.81 


14.72±0.01 


11.28±0.06 


22.58±0.03 


0.01±0.03 


1.12±0.02 


-0.13±0.05 


-0.15±0.04 


144 


NGC5338 


8800 


7.2 


13.87±0.03 


-15.42±0.53 


55.05± 6.15 


13.97±0.03 


17.20±0.17 


23.04±0.05 


0.16±0.03 


1.17±0.03 


0.26±0.06 


0.11±0.05 


145 


NGC5356 


8831 


17.9 


13.26±0.08 


-18.00±0.24 


67.42±25.94 


13.47±0.08 


27.32±0.32 


23.15±0.07 


0.29±0.09 


1.45±0.08 


0.02±0.15 


-0.14±0.15 


146 


A1355ap4613 


8876 


25.7 


14.38±0.01 


-17.67±0.16 


28.69± 2.40 


14.43±0.01 


5.74±0.04 


21.15±0.02 


O.SliO.Ol 


1.54±0.01 


-0.25±0.02 


-0.15±0.02 


147 


NGC54a7 


8930 


57.7 


14.25±0.06 


-19.56±0.10 


46.85±11.41 


14.53±0.08 


16.13±0.26 


23.81±0.09 


0.51±0.06 


1.59±0.06 


-O.OOiO.lO 


-O.lOiO.lO 


148 


NGC5425 


8933 


25.0 


14.23±0.01 


-17.76±0.17 


34.89± 1.16 


14.25±0.01 


13.67±0.05 


22.33±0.02 


-0.07±0.02 


1.06±0.01 


-0.23±0.03 


-0.28±0.03 


149 


A14016p3559 


8984 


41.9 


14.35±0.02 


-18.76±0.10 


29.54± 2.80 


14.40±0.01 


7.08±0.04 


21.46±0.02 


0.49±0.02 


1.52±0.02 


-0.12±0.03 


-0.10±0.03 


150 


NGC5470 


9020 


13.5 


14.15±0.04 


-16.50±0.30 


45.42± 7.16 


14.23±0.03 


18.11±0.17 


22.92±0.06 


0.24±0.05 


1.56±0.04 


-0.06±0.08 


-0.14±0.07 


151 


NGC5491 


9072 


60.8 


13.91±0.02 


-20.01±0.07 


45.65± 3.55 


13.97±0.01 


13.48±0.06 


22.12±0.03 


0.26±0.02 


1.41±0.02 


-0.27±0.03 


-0.29±0.03 


152 


NGC5532 


9137 


76.0 


13.03±0.03 


-21.37±0.06 


80.63±11.38 


13.16±0.04 


22.29±0.25 


23.02±0.06 


0.55±0.03 


1.67±0.03 


-0.07±0.05 


-0.07±0.05 


153 


NGC5541 


9139 


80.2 


13.94±0.02 


-20.58±0.06 


32.66± 3.21 


13.97±0.02 


9.04±0.14 


21.28±0.03 


-0.01±0.02 


1.14±0.02 


-0.09±0.04 


-0.11±0.05 


154 


NGC5596 


9208 


35.6 


14.53±0.01 


-18.23±0.12 


32.56± 1.27 


14.57±0.01 


8.11±0.04 


22.14±0.02 


0.39±0.01 


1.50±0.01 


-0.21±0.02 


-0.18±0.02 


155 


NGC5608 


9219 


9.7 


14.16±0.03 


-15.76±0.41 


54.40± 3.27 


14.29±0.03 


24.97±0.36 


23.72±0.08 


-0.46±0.03 


1.16±0.03 


-0.09±0.06 


-0.17±0.05 


156 


A143a5pll49 


9356 


26.0 


14.18±0.02 


-17.89±0.16 


34.61± 1.77 


14.24±0.01 


11.50±0.06 


21.88±0.03 


-0.12±0.02 


0.94±0.02 


-0.19±0.04 


-0.17±0.03 


157 


NGC5684 


9402 


44.5 


13.68±0.03 


-19.56±0.10 


59.69± 7.33 


13.85±0.03 


18.15±0.13 


23.23±0.04 


0.49±0.03 


1.53±0.03 


-0.05±0.05 


-0.10±0.05 


158 


NGC5762 


9535 


21.8 


13.94±0.02 


-17.75±0.19 


58.33± 3.13 


14.04±0.02 


16.67±0.16 


23.27±0.03 


0.04±0.03 


1.22±0.03 


-0.55±0.05 


-0.48±0.04 


159 


A14489p3547 


9560 


16.7 


14.88±0.01 


-16.23±0.25 


23.52± 1.53 


14.93±0.01 


4.15±0.02 


20.86±0.02 


-0.78±0.01 


0.43±0.01 


0.06±0.02 


0.11±0.03 


160 


A14492p3545 


9562 


17.6 


14.59±0.02 


-16.64±0.23 


34.62± 1.51 


14.66±0.01 


10.70±0.05 


22.57±0.03 


-0.14±0.02 


0.86±0.02 


-0.08±0.04 


0.03±0.04 



56 



SURFACE PHOTOMETRY OF NEARBY FIELD GALAXIES 



Table 3 — Continued 



ID 


Name 


UGC 


Dist 


Btat 


a4°' 


rie 


B26 


rf 


Mf 


(C/-S)e 


(B-fl)e 


A(i7~B)t 


A(B-i?,)t 






# 


Mpc 


(mag) 


(mag) 


(") 


(mag) 


(") 


(mag/D^) 


(mag) 


(mag) 


(mag) 


(mag) 


(1) 


(2) 


(3) 


(4) 


(5) 


(6) 


(7) 


(8) 


(9) 


(10) 


(11) 


(12) 


(13) 


(14) 


161 


IC1066 


9573 


19.6 


13.87±0.02 


-17.59±0.21 


42.32± 3.54 


13.92±0.02 


13.23±0.09 


22.10±0.03 


0.08±0.03 


1.16±0.02 


-0.18±0.05 


-0.28±0.03 


162 


A14594p4454 


9660 


9.8 


14.33±0.01 


-15.62±0.40 


31.15± 3.13 


14.38±0.01 


7.69±0.02 


21.34±0.02 


-0.29±0.02 


0.65±0.01 


-D.D2±0.03 


0.07±0.02 


163 


A15016pl037 




109.5 


14.80±0.03 


-20.40±0.05 


17.27± 2.13 


14.83±0.03 


1.43±0.05 


18.30±0.12 


-0.48±0.11 


0.76±0.06 


-0.65±0.20 


-0.06±0.12 


164 


ICllOO 


9729 


69.2 


14.20±0.02 


-20.00±0.07 


33.33± 1.93 


14.27±0.01 


10.62±0.05 


21.86±0.03 


0.12±0.02 


1.23±0.02 


-0.11±0.03 


-0.19±0.03 


165 


NGC5874 


9736 


35.4 


13.63±0.06 


-19.12±0.13 


60.92± 5.46 


13.70±0.03 


28.61±0.24 


23.18±0.06 


0.07±0.07 


1.35±0.06 


-0.19±0.11 


-0.16±0.11 


166 


NGC5875A 


9741 


29.0 


14.51±0.01 


-17.80±0.15 


34.96± 2.24 


14.58±0.01 


9.95±0.04 


21.84±0.03 


-0.24±0.02 


0.86±0.01 


-0.06±0.03 


-0.01±0.03 


167 


NGC5888 


9771 


90.7 


14.15±0.06 


-20.64±0.08 


39.55± 3.52 


14.23±0.04 


14.32±0.23 


22.48±0.11 


0.45±0.06 


1.53±0.06 


-0.3D±0.10 


-0.25±0.10 


168 


IC1124 


9869 


55.7 


14.58±0.01 


-19.15±0.08 


24.64± 1.47 


14.60±0.01 


7.89±0.03 


21.54±0.03 


0.18±0.02 


1.39±0.01 


-0.11±0.03 


-0.25±0.02 


169 


NGC5940 


9876 


101.9 


14.49±0.02 


-20.55±0.05 


30.00± 1.35 


14.53±0.02 


10.65±0.09 


22.16±0.04 


-0.05±0.04 


1.20±0.02 


-0.09±0.08 


-0.19±0.04 


170 


A15314p6744 


9896 


68.2 


14.39±0.02 


-19.78±0.07 


37.96± 1.73 


14.42±0.02 


15.11±0.10 


22.73±0.04 




1.25±0.02 




-0.30±0.04 


171 


NGC5993 


10007 


97.5 


14.01±0.03 


-20.93±0.05 


43.53± 6.78 


14.09±0.03 


11.41±0.18 


22.01±0.02 


-0.09±0.04 


1.03±0.03 


0.04±0.07 


-0.08±0.06 


172 


IC1141 


10051 


47.6 


14.77±0.02 


-18.62±0.09 


23.53± 0.99 


14.80±0.01 


5.68±0.11 


21.84±0.03 


0.08±0.02 


1.35±0.02 


0.02±0.03 


-0.03±0.04 


173 


IC1144 


10069 


122.8 


14.81±0.02 


-20.64±0.04 


29.39± 3.81 


14.89±0.02 


5.79±0.15 


21.76±0.03 


0.19±0.05 


1.46±0.02 


-0.21±0.06 


-0.17±0.04 


174 


NGC6007 


10079 


106.3 


14.02±0.03 


-21.11±0.05 


42.41± 3.03 


14.06±0.02 


16.93±0.13 


22.60±0.05 


0.15±0.04 


1.27±0.03 


-0.28±0.06 


-0.39±0.05 


175 


A15523pl645 


10086 


25.7 


14.92±0.07 


-17.13±0.18 


20.69± 2.21 


15.12±0.01 


5.84±0.03 


21.38±0.03 


0.04±0.09 


1.01±0.07 


-0.01±0.16 


-0.09±0.12 


176 


A15542p4800 


10097 


63.6 


13.68±0.03 


-20.34±0.07 


60.66± 9.29 


13.84±0.04 


15.36±0.13 


22.94±0.04 


0.56±0.03 


1.59±0.03 


-0.10±0.05 


-0.20±0.06 


177 


NGC6020 


10100 


47.3 


13.73±0.03 


-19.65±0.09 


56.11± 7.94 


13.89±0.04 


14.45±0.09 


22.77±0.03 


0.56±0.03 


1.58±0.03 


-0.09±0.05 


-0.08±0.05 


178 


NGC6123 


10333 


43.8 


14.71±0.02 


-18.50±0.10 


24.29± 3.86 


14.77±D.02 


5.38±0.02 


21.08±0.02 


0.58±0.02 


1.55±0.02 


-0.11±0.03 


-0.10±0.03 


179 


NGC6131 


10356 


54.2 


13.92±0.11 


-19.75±0.14 


51.44± 6.83 


14.04±0.07 


20.11±0.62 


22.88±0.20 


-O.lliO.ll 


1.08±0.11 


-0.03±0.18 


-0.16±0.18 


180 


NGC6185 


10444 


104.9 


13.77±0.03 


-21.33±0.05 


56.25± 4.62 


13.92±D.02 


15.49±0.10 


22.77±0.03 


0.45±0.03 


1.50±0.03 


-D.16±0.05 


-0.18±0.04 


181 


NGC7077 


11755 


13.2 


14.44±0.02 


-16.17±0.31 


33.32± 3.88 


14.50±0.02 


7.04±0.05 


21.72±0.03 


-D.30±0.02 


0.78±0.02 


0.22±0.05 


0.28±0.04 


182 


NGC7194 


11888 


82.4 


13.72±0.03 


-20.86±0.06 


60.56± 8.04 


13.88±D.D4 


15.65±D.13 


23.07±0.04 


0.57±0.03 


1.6D±0.03 


-0.09±0.06 


-0.08±0.05 


183 


A22306p0750 


12074 


21.3 


14.30±0.04 


-17.34±0.20 


25.34± 2.34 


14.38±0.01 


8.11±0.03 


21.22±0.02 


0.00±0.04 


1.15±0.04 


-0.06±0.06 


-0.11±0.06 


184 


NGC7328 


12118 


29.5 


13.82±0.02 


-18.53±0.14 


42.29± 2.45 


13.86±0.01 


14.33±0.08 


22.15±0.03 


0.23±0.02 


1.41±0.02 


-0.07±0.03 


-0.13±0.03 


185 


NGC7360 


12167 


47.6 


14.59±0.02 


-18.80±0.09 


32.38± 4.19 


14.66±0.02 


8.23±0.04 


21.96±0.02 


0.36±0.02 


1.45±0.02 


-0.17±0.04 


-0.18±0.03 


186 


A22426p0610 


12178 


20.4 


12.77±0.12 


-18.78±0.24 


87.54±14.56 


12.86±0.06 


36.31±0.68 


23.13±0.12 


-0.18±0.12 


0.86±0.12 


-0.06±0.21 


-0.19±().21 


187 


A22551pl931 


12265 


57.9 


15.69±0.02 


-18.13±0.08 


19.65± 2.95 


15.79±0.03 


4.73±0.04 


22.00±0.03 


0.05±0.04 


1.32±0.03 


0.19±0.10 


-0.04±0.05 


188 


NGC7436 


12269 


75.4 


13.25±0.04 


-21.14±0.07 


80.18±13.46 


13.41±0.06 


28.11±0.43 


23.60±0.10 


0.60±0.04 


1.65±0.04 


-0.11±0.08 


-0.13±0.07 


189 


NGC746D 


12312 


33.5 


13.42±0.01 


-19.21±0.13 


54.44± 3.76 


13.48±D.D1 


17.04±0.D9 


22.03±0.03 


-0.08±0.02 


1.03±0.01 


-0.01±0.03 


-0.09±0.03 


190 


NGC7537 


12442 


27.2 


13.78±0.02 


-18.39±0.16 


41.83± 4.91 


13.83±0.01 


11.93±0.07 


21.98±0.03 


-0.01±0.02 


1.25±0.02 


-0.15±0.04 


-0.28±0.04 


191 


NGC7548 


12455 


80.3 


14.24±0.02 


-20.28±0.06 


42.24± 2.72 


14.32±0.01 


13.39±0.15 


22.84±0.04 


0.53±0.03 


1.61±0.02 


-0.14±0.04 


-0.19±0.04 


192 


A23176pl541 


12519 


44.7 


14.46±0.01 


-18.79±0.10 


30.55± 2.08 


14.51±0.01 


11.98±0.05 


22.28±0.03 


0.09±0.02 


1.28±0.01 


-0.22±0.03 


-0.31±0.02 


193 


NGC7620 


12520 


98.1 


13.80±0.01 


-21.16±0.D4 


37.64± 1.95 


13.83±0.01 


10.07±0.04 


21.68±0.02 


0.03±0.01 


1.13±0.01 


-0.21±0.02 


-0.28±0.02 


194 


A23264pl703 


12620 


69.2 


13.49±0.02 


-20.71±0.D7 


61.56± 4.85 


13.60±0.02 


17.06±0.14 


22.94±0.03 


0.54±0.02 


1.61±0.02 


-0.08±0.04 


-0.09±0.03 


195 


IC1504 


12734 


63.1 


14.15±0.02 


-19.85±0.07 


38.14± 2.97 


14.22±0.01 


14.53±0.10 


22.50±0.04 


0.26±0.03 


1.47±0.02 


-0.17±0.05 


-0.31±0.04 


196 


NGC7752 


12779 


50.3 


14.52±0.03 


-18.99±0.09 


31.20± 4.78 


14.66±0.03 


6.49±0.03 


21.32±0.03 


-0.30±0.03 


1.01±0.03 


0.23±0.06 


0.05±0.06 


197 


A23514p2813 


12835 


70.5 


14.22±0.05 


-20.02±0.08 


42.72± 3.20 


14.39±0.02 


11.02±0.11 


22.73±0.03 


0.55±0.05 


1.61±0.05 


-O.OliO.lO 


-0.09±0.09 


198 


A23542pl633 


12856 


19.1 


14.29±0.03 


-17.11±0.22 


43.97± 1.67 


14.34±0.02 


19.04±0.18 


23.19±0.06 


-0.16±0.03 


0.73±0.03 


-0.13±0.06 


-0.09±0.06 



abbreviated; colour difference measures A(f/ — 5)25-75 and A{B — R)2 



are implied. 



This figure "fig3_01.gif" is available in "gif ' format from: 



http://arXiv.org/ps/astro-ph/9910075vl 



This figure "fig2.gif" is available in "gif ' format from: 



http://arXiv.org/ps/astro-ph/9910075vl 



This figure "fig3_02.gif" is available in "gif ' format from: 



http://arXiv.org/ps/astro-ph/9910075vl 



This figure "fig3_03.gif" is available in "gif ' format from: 



http://arXiv.org/ps/astro-ph/9910075vl 



This figure "fig3_04.gif" is available in "gif ' format from: 



http://arXiv.org/ps/astro-ph/9910075vl 



This figure "fig3_05.gif" is available in "gif ' format from: 



http://arXiv.org/ps/astro-ph/9910075vl 



This figure "fig3_06.gif" is available in "gif ' format from: 



http://arXiv.org/ps/astro-ph/9910075vl 



This figure "fig3_07.gif" is available in "gif ' format from: 



http://arXiv.org/ps/astro-ph/9910075vl 



This figure "fig3_08.gif" is available in "gif ' format from: 



http://arXiv.org/ps/astro-ph/9910075vl 



This figure "fig3_09.gif" is available in "gif ' format from: 



http://arXiv.org/ps/astro-ph/9910075vl 



This figure "fig3_10.gif" is available in "gif ' format from: 



http://arXiv.org/ps/astro-ph/9910075vl 



This figure "fig3_ll.gif" is available in "gif ' format from: 



http://arXiv.org/ps/astro-ph/9910075vl 



This figure "fig3_12.gif" is available in "gif ' format from: 



http://arXiv.org/ps/astro-ph/9910075vl 



This figure "fig3_13.gif" is available in "gif ' format from: 



http://arXiv.org/ps/astro-ph/9910075vl 



This figure "fig3_14.gif" is available in "gif ' format from: 



http://arXiv.org/ps/astro-ph/9910075vl 



This figure "fig3_15.gif" is available in "gif ' format from: 



http://arXiv.org/ps/astro-ph/9910075vl 



This figure "fig3_16.gif" is available in "gif ' format from: 



http://arXiv.org/ps/astro-ph/9910075vl 



This figure "fig3_17.gif" is available in "gif ' format from: 



http://arXiv.org/ps/astro-ph/9910075vl 



This figure "fig3_18.gif" is available in "gif ' format from: 



http://arXiv.org/ps/astro-ph/9910075vl 



This figure "fig3_19.gif" is available in "gif ' format from: 



http://arXiv.org/ps/astro-ph/9910075vl 



This figure "fig3_20.gif" is available in "gif ' format from: 



http://arXiv.org/ps/astro-ph/9910075vl 



This figure "fig3_21.gif" is available in "gif ' format from: 



http://arXiv.org/ps/astro-ph/9910075vl 



This figure "fig3_22.gif" is available in "gif ' format from: 



http://arXiv.org/ps/astro-ph/9910075vl 



This figure "fig3_23.gif" is available in "gif ' format from: 



http://arXiv.org/ps/astro-ph/9910075vl 



This figure "fig3_24.gif" is available in "gif ' format from: 



http://arXiv.org/ps/astro-ph/9910075vl 



This figure "fig3_25.gif" is available in "gif ' format from: 



http://arXiv.org/ps/astro-ph/9910075vl 



This figure "fig3_26.gif" is available in "gif ' format from: 



http://arXiv.org/ps/astro-ph/9910075vl 



This figure "fig3_27.gif" is available in "gif ' format from: 



http://arXiv.org/ps/astro-ph/9910075vl 



This figure "fig3_28.gif" is available in "gif ' format from: 



http://arXiv.org/ps/astro-ph/9910075vl 



This figure "fig3_29.gif" is available in "gif ' format from: 



http://arXiv.org/ps/astro-ph/9910075vl 



This figure "fig3_30.gif" is available in "gif ' format from: 



http://arXiv.org/ps/astro-ph/9910075vl 



This figure "fig3_31.gif" is available in "gif ' format from: 



http://arXiv.org/ps/astro-ph/9910075vl 



This figure "fig3_32.gif" is available in "gif ' format from: 



http://arXiv.org/ps/astro-ph/9910075vl 



This figure "fig3_33.gif" is available in "gif ' format from: 



http://arXiv.org/ps/astro-ph/9910075vl 



This figure "fig3_34.gif" is available in "gif ' format from: 



http://arXiv.org/ps/astro-ph/9910075vl 



This figure "fig3_35.gif" is available in "gif ' format from: 



http://arXiv.org/ps/astro-ph/9910075vl